Admin Feedback Thread (Archived)

[Jeremy Hunter]

I find this more of a political stunt rather than solving actual issues. Or at least a decision that is poorly thought out with a very narrow target audience of two people.

While we have theoretical problems as ability to engage without RP ( Wilde ), broken IDs that are not being fixed for a month, event requests that are not being hosted for four months, people on probation/temp ban posting ooRP crap and other issues that are more common and more important than 2 furry fans.

While I won't go to the extremes Snak is here, the sentiment is pretty valid to be honest. There are much bigger fish to fry, more pressing matters than a nearly harmless disconnect between what the community will accept and what some community members choose to do with their spare time, and I'd be happy to show you all some much more immersion-breaking RP than this if you so wish.

Now, someone go make sure the sky isn't red and/or falling

This is a day I didn't think would come. The day that I agree with Snak3, the day I finally said his name as it should.

Because he's right. This move was a targetted attack on two people, one of whom has spent years roleplaying and building up, who has brought up factions and watched their fall. We have broken IDs, we have many things being waited on and sanctions I'm pretty damn sure aren't filed and acted upon yet. We have months of requests I read in the FSR, we have people on probabtion who continually show they don't give a damn.


If you want that 1.0 rule update to promote transparency and fairness, then in that spirit of fairness I demand to know what instigated this shocking decree, who all did the voting and who voted yes, and who voted no.

I want to know every admin's ruling and know how much of a majority this actually was.


And, I want to know straight. How many player requests were submitted by people you knew very well were doing it for the wrong reasons?