Admin Feedback Thread (Archived)

[Reid]

Normally I would be for the freedom of someone's roleplay, even though I disagreed with furries being on the server, there was no official ruling. But now there is an official ruling, they do not make sense in roleplay, so they should not be here. Bret knew what he was doing when he made a furry character in a game where they don't exist in lore. He knew what he was doing when he spent all that money on the images. That's not the admins problem. People had been asking the admins for years to make a ruling on this, and now that they have, everyone is screaming final nail.

Should an exception be made for Bret because he's been roleplaying the same character for years? Maybe, that's not my decision to make. Should exceptions be made for future characters with "believable" backstories as to how they became furries? I don't think so.

But then again, if your character's appearance is the main aspect of their personality and purpose on this server, I think you need to go back to the drawing board.

I find this more of a political stunt rather than solving actual issues. Or at least a decision that is poorly thought out with a very narrow target audience of two people.

While we have theoretical problems as ability to engage without RP ( Wilde ), broken IDs that are not being fixed for a month, event requests that are not being hosted for four months, people on probation/temp ban posting ooRP crap and other issues that are more common and more important than 2 furry fans.

If "wasting time" on this topic that's been debated on Discovery for longer than I've been here is such a big issue, then why do you seem so keen on pushing it any further. All you're doing is taking away "precious time" that you say can be spent on everything you listed.