Admin Feedback Thread (Archived)

[Thyrzul]

Drawing a line where to stop when discussing slavery and related topics? Sure, no problem. Punishing severely those who rush past said line and submit heavily inappropriate content for display? All is fine. Doing the second before the first? A bit too overreactive. This community has been infamous for inconsequent and arbitrary rulings about what's right and what's wrong, we have swear filters in effect while we deal with alcohol, drugs, slavery, piracy, wars, etc in-game on a daily basis. Can we then reasonably expect people to use the oh-so-often referenced, but otherwise non-existent "common sense" and guess, like a mentalist, where the invisible lines of appropriateness are?

Removal of the excessively inappropriate content, a warning for the faction and some easily accessible green text clarifying a situation would have been enough. Removal of the entire work of a faction (including content previously considered appropriate enough) for something they weren't warned about beforehand is not teaching them a lesson the hard way. It's pointless destruction, and people are more likely learn about the inconsequential mercilessness of the Admin Team.

@"Protégé"
"That line was the main reason I chose Cryer ID for Wisp - because it used to allow fun gameplay and some interesting roleplay opportunities."
Did you mean the part where you ragequitted from Bloodroses because Chrono, the faction's actual leader, did not agree with you, and you made Wisp to hunt Outcasts with Cryer for revenge as this "fun gameplay and some interesting roleplay opportunities" thing?

---