• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Role-Playing Unofficial Factions and Groups
« Previous 1 … 164 165 166 167 168 … 390 Next »
Daumann Heavy Construction feedback

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Daumann Heavy Construction feedback
Offline Jack_Henderson
05-27-2016, 12:01 AM, (This post was last modified: 05-27-2016, 12:09 AM by Jack_Henderson.)
#112
Independent Miners Guild
Posts: 6,103
Threads: 391
Joined: Nov 2010

Okay, some feedback - this time from the Corsair side.

1. Nice use of Admin privileges. Performing an IP check on the post done on the shared Council account and using the intel to put pressure on Clavius is definitly the way things should not be done. For all those who do not know, the account is shared, all posts that are made by it are internally discussed before they are sent.

Quickly erasing the message afterwards showed that you exactly knew what you did there and that it was wrong.



2. Being snarky on the oorp section after an irp post (ye, we caught you there before the edit again) is not cool either.

Original version:

Quote://heyhey!
just use transmission bump thread, or skype bump. DHC leadership is a busy one! Big Grin
Also, you should reconsider in TBH who are you letting in HC
that's all, have fun! we will make omegas wild and dangerous yet, see you in space! Big Grin

I know you hate me, and you see IMG-conspiracy against you everywhere, but that does not give you the right to put pressure on Clavius and interfere in who he has in his High Command. So, please abstain from doing this. You are using your powerful position as an Admin to actually influence a player.



3. No one complains if a faction answers slowly. But if you assume that 18 days is okay, you are wrong, especially as you were contacted a few times (and you delayed another rp, and then suddenly said you would not even be able to participate). That's more than bad style and simply unfair to all other participants.

If you assume that 10 months for some simple rp is okay, you are very wrong. If you assume that "our support irply continues, even though we do nothing for more than a year" works, you are also very wrong.
Sounds harsh, but if you cannot manage to reply to forum roleplay within 1 week (and that's already pretty extremely slow), perhaps you should find someone in your faction that can, or perhaps not lead a faction.



4. It makes perfect sense for Corsairs to not be patient people. Look at their lore. Look at who DHC is dealing with. If we wanted to play it tough, we would not have waited for nearly a year. Corsairs are fierce and not the type you play delaying games with. So critizising the roleplay for being too harsh (e.g. ultimatuum complaint/surprise) makes zero sense because it is already unrealistically soft given the DHC performance. TBH aims at portraying the Corsairs - as an official faction should - not some cuddly soft version of it.



5. DHC quickly defined their Sair diplo to +0.3 before the "State your hate/love" rule came online. A very disputable move, because IF you were challenged on it, I bet Admins would not permit it. Why? There is literally no noteworthy roleplay that you could link, and linking roleplay to justify the change is a necessity. So, I suggest you actually put some effort into this or find someone to do it because I do not see any reason so far to justify it and to see why Sairs should treat DHC as +0.3 "getting towards being friends".



The solution is easy: roleplay. Ingame. On forums. At an acceptable pace. One documented supply flight in a month has to be possible. A forum post every few days has to be possible. And stop interfering with internal affairs of other factions, as long as they stay perfectly inside their lore and roleplay. And please stop using your Admin power in questionable ways.

Thank you.

Jack
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Daumann Heavy Construction - 07-24-2012, 01:57 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by indy.miner1 - 11-27-2012, 01:26 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 11-27-2012, 03:58 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Cris - 01-23-2013, 01:42 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Blitzbirne91 - 03-24-2013, 01:27 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Daumann Heavy Construction - 03-24-2013, 03:22 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Rodnas - 08-13-2013, 09:38 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 08-17-2013, 11:52 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Rodnas - 08-17-2013, 12:26 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Karst - 12-06-2013, 06:45 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Highland Laddie - 12-06-2013, 07:52 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 12-08-2013, 01:15 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Gytrash - 02-04-2015, 07:23 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Moberg - 02-04-2015, 07:47 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Gytrash - 02-04-2015, 08:19 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Gytrash - 02-04-2015, 08:51 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Stoner_Steve - 02-04-2015, 08:06 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Wildkins - 02-04-2015, 08:12 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Stoner_Steve - 02-04-2015, 08:16 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Moberg - 02-04-2015, 08:13 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Wildkins - 02-04-2015, 08:20 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Stoner_Steve - 02-04-2015, 08:29 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Aazalot - 02-04-2015, 08:21 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Moberg - 02-04-2015, 09:18 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Gytrash - 02-04-2015, 09:32 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Wildkins - 02-04-2015, 08:22 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Gytrash - 02-04-2015, 08:24 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Wildkins - 02-04-2015, 08:25 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Wildkins - 02-04-2015, 08:34 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Stoner_Steve - 02-04-2015, 08:43 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Aazalot - 02-04-2015, 09:35 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Moberg - 02-04-2015, 09:53 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Aazalot - 02-04-2015, 10:03 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Moberg - 02-04-2015, 10:11 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Aazalot - 02-04-2015, 10:15 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 02-05-2015, 09:17 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Omi - 02-05-2015, 09:23 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pancakes - 02-05-2015, 09:35 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by HeadHunter - 02-05-2015, 10:03 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 02-05-2015, 10:11 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Thyrzul - 02-05-2015, 10:11 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Moberg - 02-05-2015, 10:25 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Omi - 02-05-2015, 10:28 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by S A D B O Y - 02-05-2015, 10:26 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Doria - 02-05-2015, 11:48 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 02-06-2015, 10:04 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 02-06-2015, 02:53 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 02-06-2015, 05:07 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 02-06-2015, 05:53 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by HeadHunter - 02-06-2015, 06:45 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 02-06-2015, 07:06 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jansen - 02-06-2015, 08:18 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Stoner_Steve - 02-06-2015, 08:41 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 02-06-2015, 08:42 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Doria - 02-06-2015, 08:43 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Doria - 02-06-2015, 08:58 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 02-06-2015, 09:22 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Stoner_Steve - 02-06-2015, 10:00 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Eduard - 02-06-2015, 09:31 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 02-06-2015, 10:08 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pancakes - 02-08-2015, 10:57 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 02-08-2015, 03:32 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Shinju - 02-09-2015, 09:30 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 02-11-2015, 11:59 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by FRS- Free Renegade Society - 05-04-2015, 11:54 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-08-2015, 12:01 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 11:02 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 11:27 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 05-16-2015, 11:38 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by jammi - 05-16-2015, 11:42 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 11:43 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 05-16-2015, 11:53 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by SpaceTime - 05-16-2015, 11:59 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 12:10 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by SpaceTime - 05-16-2015, 12:19 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by QuinnZai - 05-16-2015, 12:15 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 12:18 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 12:24 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Danny-boy - 05-16-2015, 12:27 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Havok - 05-16-2015, 12:37 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 12:38 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Doria - 05-16-2015, 12:38 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Moberg - 05-16-2015, 12:44 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Danny-boy - 05-16-2015, 12:45 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 12:47 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Doria - 05-16-2015, 12:53 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Danny-boy - 05-16-2015, 12:54 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 12:55 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 01:00 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Danny-boy - 05-16-2015, 01:00 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Sabru - 05-16-2015, 01:05 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Danny-boy - 05-16-2015, 01:11 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 05-16-2015, 01:18 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jansen - 05-16-2015, 01:21 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 02:03 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-16-2015, 02:40 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Danny-boy - 05-16-2015, 02:41 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 06-04-2015, 10:46 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by BoyHippo - 03-25-2016, 09:26 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 04-23-2016, 12:03 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Stoner_Steve - 04-23-2016, 03:22 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 04-23-2016, 03:27 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Loki 666 - 04-23-2016, 04:15 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jansen - 04-23-2016, 04:53 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 04-23-2016, 05:23 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Lythrilux - 04-23-2016, 05:26 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Virus- - 04-23-2016, 10:43 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by nOmnomnOm - 04-24-2016, 07:51 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 04-24-2016, 07:53 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by nOmnomnOm - 04-24-2016, 08:56 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Jack_Henderson - 05-27-2016, 12:01 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-27-2016, 12:10 AM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Xenon - 05-27-2016, 04:17 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Stoner_Steve - 05-27-2016, 05:11 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Pavel - 05-27-2016, 05:38 PM
RE: Daumann Heavy Construction feedback - by Xenon - 05-27-2016, 05:54 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode