• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 68 69 70 71 72 … 547 Next »
TLAGSnet is meh

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

TLAGSnet is meh
Offline Croft
06-26-2016, 05:12 PM,
#40
Member
Posts: 1,642
Threads: 124
Joined: Oct 2011

It's the age old argument of "smugglers shouldn't be seen" vs "no interaction is bad" which is further reinforced by smugglers losing both cargo and credits for being caught. The compromise isn't my idea but was thought up by someone in one of the many smuggler threads.

The idea was if smugglers got caught the police could escort the smuggler to a sellpoint for whatever contriband and then issue a fine based upon the amount so smugglers dont face a double loss and still get a small profit plus some fun for the police. E.g. An artifact smuggler gets caught in Liberty, the LPI fly him to Denver to "confiscate" his 3000 cargo and issue a fine for 7-8 million, leaving the smuggler with 4 to 3 million in profit compared to the 11 mill made by not being caught.

This way smugglers arent punished for daring to be seen and police get to actively hunt without destroying their own source of activity.

Jimmy The Rat | Croft's Feedback | The Rat Pack
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
TLAGSnet is meh - by Pavel - 06-25-2016, 01:11 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Thyrzul - 06-25-2016, 01:28 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Pavel - 06-25-2016, 01:33 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Thyrzul - 06-25-2016, 01:40 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Pavel - 06-25-2016, 01:51 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Thyrzul - 06-25-2016, 02:33 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Hannibal - 06-25-2016, 01:59 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Croft - 06-25-2016, 02:16 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Wildkins - 06-25-2016, 02:38 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Skorak - 06-25-2016, 02:42 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Pavel - 06-25-2016, 02:46 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Skorak - 06-25-2016, 02:48 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by sindroms - 06-25-2016, 02:58 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Stoner_Steve - 06-25-2016, 04:26 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Ninja - 06-25-2016, 03:00 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Laz - 06-25-2016, 03:10 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Laura C. - 06-25-2016, 04:23 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Shinju - 06-25-2016, 04:28 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Mephistoles - 06-25-2016, 04:31 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Hannibal - 06-25-2016, 04:32 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Stoner_Steve - 06-25-2016, 04:41 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Kauket - 06-25-2016, 04:35 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by sindroms - 06-25-2016, 04:52 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by n00bl3t - 06-25-2016, 05:37 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Stoner_Steve - 06-25-2016, 05:42 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Pavel - 06-25-2016, 04:55 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Laura C. - 06-25-2016, 05:05 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Freeport7 - 07-20-2016, 04:20 AM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Thyrzul - 06-25-2016, 05:09 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Stoner_Steve - 06-25-2016, 05:11 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by nOmnomnOm - 06-25-2016, 05:47 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by n00bl3t - 06-25-2016, 06:01 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Jack_Henderson - 06-25-2016, 06:28 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by n00bl3t - 06-25-2016, 06:31 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Mercarryn - 06-25-2016, 07:34 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Croft - 06-25-2016, 06:59 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Croft - 06-25-2016, 08:40 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by n00bl3t - 06-26-2016, 03:40 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Laura C. - 06-26-2016, 05:00 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Pavel - 06-26-2016, 02:42 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Croft - 06-26-2016, 05:12 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Laura C. - 06-26-2016, 05:25 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Croft - 06-26-2016, 05:51 PM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Sombs - 07-20-2016, 02:41 AM
RE: TLAGSnet is meh - by Inferno - 07-20-2016, 03:05 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode