Dismay

[Laura C.]

I think Thyr summed it nicely. Nothing more to say.

I agree. The way how the ban was executed created atmosphere where all people who dared to criticise staff can´t be sure if they are not on the list of "those who dodged the bullet this time". Especially when skype logs can be used against them (and so far it seems they can).

Not to mention the genuine system where people got banned without previous warning (and funnily some admins claim the reason of ban is because "they didn´t changed their attitude" - of course they didn´t if nobody told them they should...) and others which will be supposedly banned next time without previous warning are "warned" by saying "you know who you are".

Maybe I should submit player request with question if I am between those who "know who they are", because I simply don´t know if I am one of those who know who they are.

Or with question if I appeared on the list after this post. After all, it is negative, it critisise the way the stuff act so I wouldn´t be suprised if someone would label it as "bad attitude", just because I am not accepting the attitude of "admins must had good reason to ban those players, so it must be good and justified decision and thus I support it" like some others do (despite they sometimes even admit they are surprised and have no idea why some names are on the banned list).

---

On a ragebreak. Or ragequit. Time will tell.