Dismay

[Omi]

I wouldn't have any issue with the indefinite ban if, as you say, concrete proof of wrongdoing were provided. As usual, though, all we have is an opaque decision, with no clarification - the only support the administration has isn't evidence, it's a mass of self-serving individuals who like to sing in harmony with the staff for a variety of reasons, ranging from personal dislike of those banned to fishing for orange/green names themselves.

That said, my doubts that there is enough concrete evidence to justify all of the bans and the severity of the punishment levied are, at this point, almost insurmountable. Even if these could be assuaged, I would still have a bone to pick with the unprofessional, incompetent, and utterly deplorable manner in which the staff chose to go about the whole process of banning them one way or another.

In short, even if evidence was provided to support all six bans that was impossible to argue against, you would still see me calling for the staff to either put up or walk out the door on the grounds of their misconduct thus far.

---