(07-02-2016, 02:32 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: http://i.imgur.com/FMEHBC3.jpg
Why did you vote yes to ban them and say there was no other alternative if you are now telling us that there were 5 lesser offenders and that lyth only deserves a perma?
Good job on the assumption elevator once again. I only voted yes on the people I felt were really harmful, and that's three out of the lot that was on the initial list (and that was far more than 6).
My message was simply a generic one. All admins were requested to provide a message.
ignoring the French sarcasm, it surprises me that you state that you only voted yes for half but the report of the banning states otherwise.
Doesn't this just show even more that before the banning, the admins were still in disagreement about this move yet the thread shows unity on agreement of the decision taken?
Furthermore, the generalization statement lead to this mess in the first place. The thread states that the admins will give reasons but then the reasons for the most part are generalized and blanketed and until now we thought the people deciding on the ban were in full agreement.