Official Notice - Development Team Strike

[n00bl3t]

Internet discussions 101, Loaded question.
Right back at you, if you cannot come up with any compelling argument.

Which fact is presupposed by which question that I asked?

I'm keen to hear this explanation on how I committed this specific fallacy.

If you cared to contribute a valid statement at this point, you should have realized that there was no question you proposed in the first place. Instead you are just one of those members who went avol in 2010 and returned recently to try and be relevant with their ''years of experience'' that they do not in fact have.

This is awkward because I've been playing the game.

Also awkward because I've taken less breaks and returns than you.

But I see that you've redirected from the accusation of the fallacy and moved to basic ad hominem.

I can name my breaks and I am usually careful enough not to enter discussions regardind times that I wasn't around, but in the context of the discussion you have felt the need to now condense between us two- I am still waiting for you to specify the questions you were so intent on pointing out.

You keep going on about a question. I don't think you understand the Wikipedia article you linked. Try reading it again.