(07-14-2016, 04:48 PM)Jansen Wrote: This might have been handled differently, that is true, however, if we had gone by the 'standard' approach, the people would have been warned, sanctioned a few times and by the time we would have had enough bans to justify an indefinite ban this way, the people in question would have adapted their attitude in a way that makes them act in what could be called 'grey areas', where they still might have been harmful, but nearly impossible to sanction for rulebreaking.
So what you're saying is that you couldn't find a good enough reason to ban those people even after you modified the rules to be as vague as possible and suit your approach as much as you'd like.