(07-18-2016, 03:46 PM)Internity Wrote: Those who are banned now are the real threat.
Throwing incoherent accusations of that sort is less than pointless, you know. Doesn't matter how many times you repeat it, it doesn't make it true. Just because you believe in something, it doesn't make it true. You're entitled to your own opinion, but that's an opinion, not a fact. And since facts are based on evidence, I really can't see any in your post, nor can I find any evidence relevant to the bans anywhere else on this forum, only speculation, and a single post consisting of two paragraphs of generalized reasoning posted by an admin.
You see, the problem isn't just the bans, but how they were handled. I think you'll agree that any sanction based on no evidence and/or a solid argument, is invalid, unless you are prepared to set aside rules and common sense, and ban people out of the blue just because "they are a threat".
I also don't think it's wise to accuse sanctioned individuals, with no evidence or facts of any sort, it only makes you look silly, and contributes to discussions being turned into trial by forum (which I guess you are not even realizing), without the said individuals having a chance to speak for themselves. That said, if you don't mind, start talking facts and evidences, if you can't, then oh well, better keep it shut