Harvester

[ScornStar]

Oh my lord...

ScornStar, I know...you quoted that segment, it's obvious you're addressing Unselie's point.

What I want to know is what in the name of god do you mean by what you typed in response to her, because none of us can understand what you are talking about...

Manufactured by Unselie?

She can't use them in an argument?

Ok now thatwe talked this out on scyp i see what you did not understand. I'll try to make clear for other folk because if you didnt understand my point then its possible others didnt either.

My point on Unseelie's post was that while they had a veru imaginative thought pattern, the point of view was one sided. How we would look at the same equation is this, in a nut shell.

One fighter cost about 30-35 million to outfit. At the cost of three fighters we could outfit One Talarca.
One Talarca carries more cargo, then three of our fighters. One Talarca can fight off more opposition that three fighters. One Talarca can explore deeper into uncharted territory and make it back in tact with any recovered cargo. One Talarca can do more lucradive Junker missions. So, while the initial cost is higher, the dividends are much much greater.

That was my point. The Talarca is more effiecent than a fighter force. Remember we all have different missions and like any force in the world we tailor our force to task. On the other hand, Unseelie has a sharp mind it seems.

---

Eat Babies!!!!!!!!!!

Join our cause for a baby free world.

Harvester diplomacy