Admin Feedback Thread (Archived)

[Sorrontis]

I'm not sure if I understand your post correctly as it's not very clear, but are you suggesting getting rid of the (current?) administration and replacing it with nothing but a ruleset (or with a new admin team made of idk who) ?

At this point, any new administration is better than the rotten one we have now. Obviously we need admins to enforce the rules, but these one's go about doing that in the most destructive manner I've ever seen. Any new admin team should be chosen and selected by the community.

A semi-democratic system would be nice. A nice set of rules of who can be an admin. I'll start:

- Proven track record of inRP / ooRP behaviour
- Proven track record of level-headedness
- Outstanding communications skills
- Willingness to be transparent about decisions and ideas
- Never sanctioned, or if sanctioned showed that they actively worked to become better
- Active member of the community for a minimum amount of time?

I honestly don't think the entire team is rotten, I'm sure some of them can be salvaged if we give them a chance.

EDIT: Maybe a review process of the admins where proof-backed criticism can be offered; if there's simply too many problems, that admin is demoted.