• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 … 8 9 10 11 12 … 198 Next »
Idea || Two proposed new rules

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Idea || Two proposed new rules
Offline Laura C.
09-09-2016, 09:52 PM, (This post was last modified: 09-09-2016, 09:58 PM by Laura C..)
#23
Member
Posts: 1,445
Threads: 51
Joined: Dec 2011

(09-09-2016, 09:35 PM)pulha Wrote: I think this could be interesting not like the way Xenon phrased it. Maybe in another way with the changed on official factions to be more appellative for Indies to join.
Good luck with this. This topic was discussed so many times over the years...and nothing changed. There is quite easy way how to make official factions more appealing - you need to give them real benefits over indies. Better equipment, better ships, more privileges and so on. It does not have to be much even, like 10-20 % stronger armors or power cores or cargo limit, little bigger ZOI and such. But that will never happen because Disco staff took road of equality and advantages which official factions have are something like sugar coating on the cake. It is nice to have it, but it tastes well enough even without it and you get benefit of very limited accountability for your actions as a huge bonus.

(09-09-2016, 09:43 PM)pulha Wrote:
(09-09-2016, 09:15 PM)sindroms Wrote: But what about the other parts of the game world? What if your ID has no capital ships to siege a base and your only official IDed ally has a no-cap policy? Implementing this rule has severe balance concerns in terms of what factions can even utilize this rule.

Can't find a single one that fits there sorry, maybe I'm missing some.
Xenos, Unioners, Liberty Rogues, Gaians, Golden Chrystanthemums, LWB, all police and intelligence factions...I could go on. All these can´t have battleships and thus are in troubles with killing bases. Some of them can´t have even cruisers.

On a ragebreak. Or ragequit. Time will tell.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Xenon - 09-09-2016, 04:25 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Shelco - 09-09-2016, 04:29 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by pulha - 09-09-2016, 04:45 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Laura C. - 09-09-2016, 05:11 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Shaggy - 09-09-2016, 05:17 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Kauket - 09-09-2016, 05:20 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by nOmnomnOm - 09-09-2016, 05:25 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Jayce - 09-09-2016, 08:13 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by sindroms - 09-09-2016, 08:20 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Ramke - 09-09-2016, 08:52 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by pulha - 09-09-2016, 08:56 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by sindroms - 09-09-2016, 09:15 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by pulha - 09-09-2016, 09:35 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Laura C. - 09-09-2016, 09:52 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by pulha - 09-09-2016, 10:04 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by pulha - 09-09-2016, 09:43 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Sorrontis - 09-09-2016, 09:03 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by pulha - 09-09-2016, 09:14 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Petitioner - 09-09-2016, 09:09 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Durandal - 09-09-2016, 09:14 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by pulha - 09-09-2016, 09:25 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Petitioner - 09-09-2016, 09:30 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by sindroms - 09-09-2016, 09:31 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by pulha - 09-09-2016, 09:40 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by sindroms - 09-09-2016, 09:58 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Demonic - 09-10-2016, 12:48 AM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Petitioner - 09-10-2016, 01:00 AM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Demonic - 09-10-2016, 01:15 AM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Sorrontis - 09-10-2016, 04:26 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Jayce - 09-10-2016, 05:24 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Wesker - 09-10-2016, 05:36 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Backo - 09-10-2016, 07:02 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Sorrontis - 09-10-2016, 07:25 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Jayce - 09-10-2016, 07:18 PM
RE: Idea || Two proposed new rules - by Xenon - 09-10-2016, 08:13 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode