• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 64 65 66 67 68 … 780 Next »
Remove POB regulation double standards from rules

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: How should POB protection/regulation rules change?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
1. Remove restrictions of house lawfuls and let them regulate/shoot POBs in their whole ZOI fully again
47.27%
26 47.27%
2. Restrict unlawfuls/quasi-lawfuls to regulate/shoot POBs only outside of Houses Capital Systems
7.27%
4 7.27%
3. Restrict unlawfuls/quasi-lawfuls to regulate/shoot POBs only outside of Sovereign House Space systems
21.82%
12 21.82%
4. Keep rules as they are now
20.00%
11 20.00%
5. Other (suggest posted discussion)
3.64%
2 3.64%
Total 55 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Remove POB regulation double standards from rules
Offline nOmnomnOm
09-12-2016, 01:28 PM, (This post was last modified: 09-12-2016, 01:55 PM by nOmnomnOm.)
#35
Probation
Posts: 5,913
Threads: 247
Joined: May 2011

(09-12-2016, 01:26 PM)Laura C. Wrote:
(09-12-2016, 01:16 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: Step one: lawfuls demand access to base or the base gets shot down.
Step two: owner will log in to open his smuggling store up when he thinks no one will see
Step three: lawful will log in into the base and see it.
Step four: massive fine or not even that. If player is hated then for sure the base is dead.

You see a double standard here? You look like pirates when you only like to blow up bases and use that as threats against a base owner.

I wana see inrl a cop finding marijuana in an apartment building and then bringing the demolition team to blow up the whole building.

NOT GONNA HAPPEN!
You obviously don´t understand what rule is this thread about. Once again, IT IS NOT ABOUT RULE THAT MAKES CONTRABAND ON BASES INVISIBLE FOR LAWFULS.

Is this understandable enough?

Now please stop derailing the thread or I will be forced to call mods.

you said it yourself

(09-11-2016, 11:49 AM)Laura C. Wrote: But when it comes to lawfuls, they are significantly restricted. First by rule this thread is about, so they can´t destroy POBs in Outer Regional Space unless it is hostile, regardless if the base is violationg local house laws in any way. Second rule I am reffering too and which applies everywhere, even in house capital system, is that lawfuls can´t see illegal commodities on the bases inRP and make consequencies from it (fining the owner, removing the station etc.).

(09-12-2016, 01:23 PM)Laura C. Wrote: So you like throwing mud around it seems. Sure, we sit and enjoy watching the base burn. You obviously have no idea what happens in such situations, but sure. Let´s slander, why not.
I have seen it first hand. npnp

(09-12-2016, 01:23 PM)Laura C. Wrote: You like exaggerating it seems. No one asks for such amount of money. Fun facts: Kusari has fee free zones if I remember correctly and Rheinland ask less than Hessians (100 million one time payment vs 50 million month payment).
You only operate in your examples in your SMALL bubble. You bring the good examples but it seems that bad ones that are not in your favor just fly over your head.

(09-12-2016, 01:23 PM)Laura C. Wrote: Mind you elaborate how this "claiming" should look like? Because Rheinland has trade lanes, jumpgates and stations in Omega-7, had there battleship and now there is police station. Obviously this is not enough to claim this space, so I wonder how proper claiming looks like.
Can you look at Shuttgart or Hamburg and then look at Omega 7 and NOT see the clear difference?
A trade lane and a jump gate with a happy sticker on it that says "property of rheinland" does not equal that the whole system is now owned by rheinland.
A small battleship in the LARGE system does not make it your system either. Especially a system mostly in dense cloud.




TWISTING:

(09-10-2016, 01:56 PM)Laura C. Wrote: By the way, please don´t bring the flimsy justification that "houses can´t fully control their borderworlds" which I heard from some when current rules were introduced. First, how it comes that houses can´t control their borderworlds, but unlawfuls can freely have control even heart of capital system (all they need is to log in numbers massive enough) or systems which lies completely on the other side of Sirius? And second, at this moment due to current rules setup, completely nonsene situations may happen. Anyone can for example make a base in Omega-7 next to RFP station, name it "Cardamine Shipping Inc." and then really start selling cardamine. Or construct "Fighters Against Corrupted Stupid Chancellor HG" base next to Stuttgart jumpgate where they will offer money for RM/RFP pilots. Or "Die King Charles Die - Dead Royals Storage" doing the same next to GRN battleship in Provence, to bring example from some other house. In all cases, nothing can be done about it by lawfuls. Again, wrong from both inRP as well as ooRP perspective.

1st of all, bringing players that are unlawful in multiples to go into a system and 'control' it does not mean they CONTROL the system. STOP twisting this in your head as well as ours.
2nd in the case of your RFP station in Omega 7, that is an issue with the admins and you becasue you have a base in that system that is yours. That is something unique that DOES NOT APPLY LITERALLY EVERYWHERE ELSE in other boarderworlds.
Even so, I'd like to know how much significance that base has becasue from the info card it looks like it is only there in RP to monitor IMG base there.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Laura C. - 09-10-2016, 01:56 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by SkyNet - 09-10-2016, 02:27 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by nOmnomnOm - 09-10-2016, 02:42 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Laura C. - 09-10-2016, 02:57 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Arbs - 09-10-2016, 03:18 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Stoner_Steve - 09-10-2016, 11:13 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Wildkins - 09-10-2016, 11:22 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Arbs - 09-10-2016, 11:32 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Demonic - 09-11-2016, 05:56 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Sorrontis - 09-11-2016, 07:24 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by MrCharles - 09-11-2016, 07:18 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Mr.Fabulous - 09-11-2016, 07:27 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Laura C. - 09-11-2016, 10:24 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Demonic - 09-11-2016, 11:08 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Laura C. - 09-11-2016, 11:49 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Petitioner - 09-11-2016, 07:31 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Mr.Fabulous - 09-11-2016, 07:45 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Durandal - 09-11-2016, 08:14 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Demonic - 09-11-2016, 08:43 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by MrCharles - 09-11-2016, 08:26 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Epo - 09-11-2016, 08:34 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Mr.Fabulous - 09-11-2016, 09:25 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by NoMe - 09-11-2016, 10:23 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Kruger - 09-11-2016, 10:33 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Mr.Fabulous - 09-11-2016, 12:41 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Laura C. - 09-11-2016, 01:07 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Jack_Henderson - 09-12-2016, 11:43 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Laura C. - 09-12-2016, 01:08 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Thyrzul - 09-12-2016, 12:50 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by nOmnomnOm - 09-12-2016, 01:08 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Laura C. - 09-12-2016, 01:23 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by nOmnomnOm - 09-12-2016, 01:16 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Laura C. - 09-12-2016, 01:26 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by nOmnomnOm - 09-12-2016, 01:28 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by nOmnomnOm - 09-12-2016, 01:28 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by sindroms - 09-12-2016, 01:54 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Laura C. - 09-12-2016, 02:01 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Landers - 09-13-2016, 07:58 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Zayne Carrick - 09-13-2016, 09:50 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Jack_Henderson - 09-13-2016, 11:56 AM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Stoner_Steve - 11-13-2016, 02:37 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Shiki - 11-13-2016, 02:41 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Benoit - 11-13-2016, 04:49 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Epo - 11-13-2016, 05:14 PM
RE: Remove POB regulation double standards from rules - by Wesker - 11-13-2016, 05:30 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode