• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules Faction Rules Faction Review and Feedback Archived Feedback Threads
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Admin Feedback Thread (Archived)

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Thread Closed 
Admin Feedback Thread (Archived)
Offline Wesker
10-03-2016, 05:19 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-03-2016, 05:23 PM by Wesker.)
#1,015
Level 99 Boss
Posts: 5,324
Threads: 458
Joined: Nov 2014

(10-03-2016, 05:03 PM)Jansen Wrote: Regarding the XTF issue:
-Yber is here long enough, so we expected him to know he can report with things he considered to be overstepping bounds by players or the staff. Considering he did not do this and at least to my information did not talk to other Admins about this isse, the whole problem does not appear to be all that bad? Considering that even your common sense told you that a report might have been in order, then you might have informed him about this option as well?


I seriously doubt any report against any admin would even be noticed let alone voted on by the very people being accused.

Quote:-Hannibal took an action he deemed as fitting in this situation, that otherwise would likely have caused a lot of trouble. It could have been handled slightly different, but the intention behind the action taken was correct and supported by the staff.

Placing the leaders of either side of the event including the host in bastille as well as beaming away participants from an event they all agreed on and all loved and had fun in the past year/current year with is somehow "fitting" for the situation? You think he saved people trouble? He was what caused the event trouble to begin with.

"Intention behind the action taken" You really don't like interpreting the rules at all do you? Unless it involved banning 6 members you deem harmful to the community with pretty much no legit evidence of course.

Last year the admins supported the XTF event, from what I herd they even made temporary bases to support the event because the player count rose over a 100 for it and every enjoyed it. This year when the server is even more dead and the event happens again you just shut out a bunch of people. Rules are rules yea, but there's also something called "interpreting rules/laws" following the rules so bluntly did nothing but harm the people at the event.

Quote:-'A lot of people here' is a very unspecific and extremely subjective measurement, said "lot of people" appear to have been directly affected by this or at least have been affected by this because their "friends" have been. We have read the feedback in regards to this and made a decision on how to handle it.

By a lot of people he means everyone at the XTF event which is well over 100 people which is way more than the server gets online at average. Everyone who commented on the event was present. From what I've seen.

[Image: P6DLUCr.png?4][Image: AX5RcTh.png?4]
Thread Closed 


Messages In This Thread
Admin Feedback Thread (Archived) - by Garrett Jax - 04-05-2015, 06:58 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
4 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode