• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 66 67 68 69 70 … 780 Next »
Auxesia "Redacted". Really now?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Auxesia "Redacted". Really now?
Offline Chrono
10-06-2016, 11:54 AM,
#9
Member
Posts: 289
Threads: 26
Joined: Feb 2011

(10-06-2016, 11:50 AM)Alley Wrote:
(10-06-2016, 11:29 AM)Jeremy Hunter Wrote: That was BHG.
Not Core.

I believe Chrono is talking about this declaration

(10-04-2016, 09:50 PM)Foxglove Wrote: Name of player(s)/faction(s): The Core, Battlegroup Auxesia and allies
Name of Player Owned Base: Kebok Survey Station
Link to RP showing intent to attack: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread...pid1825979

Which is kinda problematic as Auxesia's faction status still list Core as hostile and the FR5 on Aux posted by Core is still in effect.

Thats one of the things I'm on about, yes. But I'm also concerned about their removing things from their sub-forum to make their thoughts about certain factions seem less... hostile.

But yes, their attack on the Order POB was a bit out of bounds given their current status with the Core. Of course, it's not exactly a secret that Core and Aux are for the most part, one and the same.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 10:25 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Shiki - 10-06-2016, 10:35 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Alley - 10-06-2016, 11:22 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Jeremy Hunter - 10-06-2016, 11:29 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Alley - 10-06-2016, 11:50 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Shiki - 10-06-2016, 11:46 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Omicron - 10-06-2016, 11:48 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Shiki - 10-06-2016, 11:51 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Jeremy Hunter - 10-06-2016, 12:04 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 11:54 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 12:12 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Jeremy Hunter - 10-06-2016, 12:21 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 12:23 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Jeremy Hunter - 10-06-2016, 12:32 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 12:38 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Jeremy Hunter - 10-06-2016, 12:40 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 12:57 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Thunderer - 10-06-2016, 12:40 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Alley - 10-06-2016, 01:44 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Sombs - 10-06-2016, 12:51 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 01:03 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Shiki - 10-06-2016, 01:08 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 01:14 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Sombs - 10-06-2016, 01:09 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 01:13 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Sombs - 10-06-2016, 01:19 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Inferno - 10-06-2016, 01:47 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 02:07 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 02:09 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Reid - 10-06-2016, 02:11 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 02:15 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Thunderer - 10-06-2016, 02:20 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Omicron - 10-06-2016, 02:28 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 02:51 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Inferno - 10-06-2016, 02:52 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Reid - 10-06-2016, 02:58 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 03:03 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Reid - 10-06-2016, 03:12 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Divine - 10-06-2016, 03:23 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Inferno - 10-06-2016, 03:18 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Inferno - 10-06-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Darku - 10-06-2016, 03:22 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 03:25 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Darku - 10-06-2016, 03:28 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Yeggito - 10-06-2016, 03:29 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Reid - 10-06-2016, 03:43 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Alley - 10-06-2016, 03:46 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Inferno - 10-06-2016, 03:34 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 03:43 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Texas Red - 10-06-2016, 03:41 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Inferno - 10-06-2016, 03:48 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode