• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 66 67 68 69 70 … 780 Next »
Auxesia "Redacted". Really now?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Auxesia "Redacted". Really now?
Offline Chrono
10-06-2016, 02:51 PM,
#34
Member
Posts: 289
Threads: 26
Joined: Feb 2011

Chrono Wrote:I think you're missing the point of one of the issues here, Nyx. You allied with Core without your rep having already changed. To answer Sombras question, your alliance to wreck a POB isn't allowed within the rules as Alley stated. Using the allied attack on the POB can not be excused by, "Working on bettering relations" because it was against the rules in the first place. And also, I'm quite sure You and Vendetta are a part of the K'hara because I know of numerous occasions you've both flown their ships. So don't pull that bull.
Auzari Wrote:what kind of stupid argument/statement is that
Chrono Wrote:Uhm, I believe it is what one would call a valid statement
Auzari Wrote:that's not valid lol

Yes, it is, now stop making my comments look like bull, Nyx. I know what you're trying to do, you're trying to make ME look like I'm in the wrong, you are NOT a friggen saint, so don't act like one.

Chrono Wrote:I love how you just contradicted your previous statement.
Auzari Wrote:wording issue, it's not contradictory.

what I meant to say was: No one is in core, but the ENTIRETY of K'Hara is not Aux (because that's what people seem to think)

Fine, then clarify next time. However, you ARE good close friends with most Core players, so my statement is still half correct.

Chrono Wrote:Uhmm, no, that is exactly what allying is. Don't try to beat around the bush and avoid the obvious with your sudo-excuses about what you think it is called.
Auzari Wrote:The Order happens to be enemies of the two factions. I mean, if we're going to do the whole 'oh you're allying thing' - well - this is just double standards at it's finest, since the Order has done it too, more than once recently.
Chrono Wrote:Yes, we have been working with the LN and 5th recently with long and heavily involved RP that LED to such a thing. Not RP that boils down to, "Oh, there an enemy base, Core, we suddenly friends, right? Gud, let go shooty shoot it, herr durr".
Auzari Wrote:Nope.

It's the same for the Order/CR/5th. You did not have diplomacy change. Your ID doesn't state the line either afaik. And you're still hostile to the Government of Liberty. There wasn't any previous roleplay about allowing hostile caps into liberty, or to engage non-nomads, or for Liberty to allow foreign military in. There was no roleplay regarding the three working against non-human things whatsoever beyond receiving a notice of declaration of war. So apparently both factions are in the 'wrong' here - although there's no rule that explicitly states about diplomacy.

There is a difference between extensive RP leading to a more friendly stance, and blatant powergaming an alliance to kill a POB. A POB that was only Core 1 by the way, you really didn't need to have Core's help in the first place.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 10:25 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Shiki - 10-06-2016, 10:35 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Alley - 10-06-2016, 11:22 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Jeremy Hunter - 10-06-2016, 11:29 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Alley - 10-06-2016, 11:50 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Shiki - 10-06-2016, 11:46 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Omicron - 10-06-2016, 11:48 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Shiki - 10-06-2016, 11:51 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Jeremy Hunter - 10-06-2016, 12:04 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 11:54 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 12:12 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Jeremy Hunter - 10-06-2016, 12:21 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 12:23 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Jeremy Hunter - 10-06-2016, 12:32 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 12:38 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Jeremy Hunter - 10-06-2016, 12:40 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 12:57 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Thunderer - 10-06-2016, 12:40 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Alley - 10-06-2016, 01:44 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Sombs - 10-06-2016, 12:51 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 01:03 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Shiki - 10-06-2016, 01:08 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 01:14 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Sombs - 10-06-2016, 01:09 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 01:13 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Sombs - 10-06-2016, 01:19 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Inferno - 10-06-2016, 01:47 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 02:07 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 02:09 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Reid - 10-06-2016, 02:11 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 02:15 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Thunderer - 10-06-2016, 02:20 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Omicron - 10-06-2016, 02:28 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 02:51 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Inferno - 10-06-2016, 02:52 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Reid - 10-06-2016, 02:58 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 03:03 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Reid - 10-06-2016, 03:12 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Divine - 10-06-2016, 03:23 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Inferno - 10-06-2016, 03:18 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Inferno - 10-06-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Darku - 10-06-2016, 03:22 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 03:25 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Darku - 10-06-2016, 03:28 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Yeggito - 10-06-2016, 03:29 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Reid - 10-06-2016, 03:43 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Alley - 10-06-2016, 03:46 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Inferno - 10-06-2016, 03:34 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 03:43 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Texas Red - 10-06-2016, 03:41 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Inferno - 10-06-2016, 03:48 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode