• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Interactive DarkMap
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 66 67 68 69 70 … 780 Next »
Auxesia "Redacted". Really now?

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Auxesia "Redacted". Really now?
Offline Yeggito
10-06-2016, 03:29 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-06-2016, 03:34 PM by Yeggito.)
#45
Member
Posts: 130
Threads: 10
Joined: Jan 2014

In all honesty, I want to be sure we're clear (and past the point) that the PoB destruction was legitimate; I'm very new here, and not sure I understand all of the intricacies of a FR5'd faction.

I think we can agree there is lag on updating info pages on the forum, and Primary Faction infocards need updating (i.e, the Order| primary tag still calls out the Core| as the BHG/Core), so we should use a grain of salt using these as hard datapoints.

For a PoB attack (it was "my" PoB), I watched closely. It hit the following checkboxes:
  • -Attack declaration thread and correct wait time
  • -RP post about why this this happened (linked previously, and all in the PoB thread)

The PoB was is in Core "controlled" space, and Sapphire Raven stumbled upon it. Information is worth something; for exchanging the location to the Core|, she negotiated better relations with he group, Aux, and the Core|. That makes sense, correct? So, she tipped off the Core| on the forums, they agreed, and then the siege post was made.

If the faction's status didn't get updated in time (...and, honestly, not sure where that lives; on the forums under each faction's info, in a main thread, ingame (unlikely), etc.), and therefore the rule Alley brought up was "broken", can we agree that is was was acceptable, due to the RP beforehand?

I want to ensure this is cleared, before someone submits a Violation report. We can settle this outside of getting Admins (overworked as they are) involved.

Believe me, I'm not jumping for joy or thrilled my/the PoB was discovered and blown to smithereens, but, it was dropped in a risky location, and survived for a month or so. The Zoner base that was dropped by the Delta JH in Lost lasted...like, 3 days before the Nomads took it out.

...

As for editing posts, there should be a changelog, somewhere, but that's just more overhead to take care of. If there aren't existing forum rules, then there's nothing officially "wrong". However, I'm surprised we are allowed to go back and change posts without a time limit. I've seen places where a post is locked after X hours after posting (i.e, 72). It prevents anyone going back and changing things. Perhaps not for sticked posts (as this is where info lives), but for regular posts.

Just some thoughts from the new guy.

Inactive; hope to be back at some point

Yeggito Kebok


Captain, Order Primary Fleet [Personnel Dossier]
  • [Image: ulMElbm.png]
  • Order|Yeggito.Kebok - 042D "Bastet" Order VHF
  • Order|"081" - 019A "Sekhmet" Order Bomber
  • Order|LV-Satet - "Bison" Class C5 Transport
  • Order|LV-Shezmu - XDS-2 "Voyager" Deep Space Freighter
  • Order|CV-Sharuna - "Hathor" Order Gunboat
  • Order|CV-Sebennytos - "Resheph" Order Reconnaissance Cruiser

Yasashiko Kebok


Permanent Kusari Exile (Bretonian Privateer)
[Image: 1XtV5Ss.png?1]
  • {/G|G\}Yasashiku.Kebok - Renzu Corp "Sutinga" VHF
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 10:25 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Shiki - 10-06-2016, 10:35 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Alley - 10-06-2016, 11:22 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Jeremy Hunter - 10-06-2016, 11:29 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Alley - 10-06-2016, 11:50 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Shiki - 10-06-2016, 11:46 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Omicron - 10-06-2016, 11:48 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Shiki - 10-06-2016, 11:51 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Jeremy Hunter - 10-06-2016, 12:04 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 11:54 AM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 12:12 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Jeremy Hunter - 10-06-2016, 12:21 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 12:23 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Jeremy Hunter - 10-06-2016, 12:32 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 12:38 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Jeremy Hunter - 10-06-2016, 12:40 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 12:57 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Thunderer - 10-06-2016, 12:40 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Alley - 10-06-2016, 01:44 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Sombs - 10-06-2016, 12:51 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 01:03 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Shiki - 10-06-2016, 01:08 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 01:14 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Sombs - 10-06-2016, 01:09 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 01:13 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Sombs - 10-06-2016, 01:19 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Inferno - 10-06-2016, 01:47 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 02:07 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 02:09 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Reid - 10-06-2016, 02:11 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 02:15 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Thunderer - 10-06-2016, 02:20 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Omicron - 10-06-2016, 02:28 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 02:51 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Inferno - 10-06-2016, 02:52 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Reid - 10-06-2016, 02:58 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Chrono - 10-06-2016, 03:03 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Reid - 10-06-2016, 03:12 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Divine - 10-06-2016, 03:23 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Inferno - 10-06-2016, 03:18 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Inferno - 10-06-2016, 03:21 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Darku - 10-06-2016, 03:22 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 03:25 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Darku - 10-06-2016, 03:28 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Yeggito - 10-06-2016, 03:29 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Reid - 10-06-2016, 03:43 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Alley - 10-06-2016, 03:46 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Inferno - 10-06-2016, 03:34 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Kauket - 10-06-2016, 03:43 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Texas Red - 10-06-2016, 03:41 PM
RE: Auxesia "Redacted". Really now? - by Inferno - 10-06-2016, 03:48 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode