Especially helpful would be a green statement, to be honest, that either clarifies by saying the concept itself is too flawed/dangerous/powergamey to be taken serious or say the opposite. The opinions on the concept are obviously really mixed and people keep PMing me with stuff about it. Discussing with people that blame the concept for black magic while they need two hours and less to fully repair/rebuild snubs and battleships without any requirement of RP or claim that nothing outside an event matters while they use blues, screens of cargos and all that on MDs and comms doesn't lead anywhere, as it is just a fest of double-standards and opinions on what-is-lore/RP-relevant/gameplay-feature/faction-toy and will only cause more and more salty comments. On the other hand, I'd like to have something of value that says I'm not putting all the effort into this just to end up with a report for powergaming or systematical filed FR5s and FR6s.
Again, as I said in the first topic, this concept is aimed to be as acceptable and fleshed-out as possible, and that's why I need concrete suggestions instead of double-standarded and ooRP-fueled arguments, or in Lamdba's disrespectful post, just getting shit thrown for even daring to think outside the box. I'm looking for a compromise here. Something that is doable.
