• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 … 7 8 9 10 11 … 198 Next »
[Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

[Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4
Offline Shaggy
12-04-2016, 01:04 PM,
#12
#BlameShaggy
Posts: 2,073
Threads: 157
Joined: Oct 2011

If there is valid inRP reasons for such temporary alliances to be made such as the one in Leeds which both CR and NC where warned for. The roleplay was done via the forums to assist a base that was located inside Bretonia house space. As Bretonia was the ones in charge and told both CR and NC to not shoot each other or there will be consequences. Why would they attack one another? They would not. They would work together for a one time thing while there is presence of the Bretonian forces then business as usual. Not only this but IDs should be seen as ooRP because all they are doing is telling the player a little about the faction lore of that specific ID and then faction rules and restrictions to keep them inside the server rules. This makes no sense as to why they should be used as an inRP identity. But what im trying to say is, that temporary alliances are legally allowed to be made via roleplay on the forums within house space. This also reminds me of the temporary alliance that was made between 5th [LN] CR| and Order| who was all given enough roleplay via the forums and ingame to form a temporary alliance whom where also sanctioned for working in the same group. Not only this but group chat is mostly used for ooRP chatter, to help coordinate fights. Organize people and call targets. There should NOT be a punishmeny for players and official factions whom have justified the temporary alliance via forum rp.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
[Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by sindroms - 12-03-2016, 10:53 PM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by nOmnomnOm - 12-03-2016, 11:27 PM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by SEI DeltaBase - 12-03-2016, 11:39 PM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by Foxglove - 12-03-2016, 11:39 PM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by Omi - 12-03-2016, 11:49 PM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by Kauket - 12-04-2016, 12:16 AM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by Divine - 12-04-2016, 02:09 AM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by sindroms - 12-04-2016, 02:10 AM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by Divine - 12-04-2016, 02:11 AM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by Foxglove - 12-04-2016, 02:25 AM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by Ihtyander - 12-04-2016, 09:26 AM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by Shaggy - 12-04-2016, 01:04 PM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by TheShooter36 - 12-04-2016, 02:42 PM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by Shiki - 12-04-2016, 03:27 PM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by Antonio - 12-04-2016, 03:33 PM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by Thunderer - 12-04-2016, 03:43 PM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by Implosion - 12-04-2016, 07:23 PM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by Shush Muppet - 12-20-2016, 01:14 PM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by Hannibal - 12-20-2016, 01:22 PM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by Shush Muppet - 12-20-2016, 01:29 PM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by Cardinal - 12-20-2016, 01:58 PM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by Cardinal - 12-20-2016, 02:08 PM
RE: [Community Input]: Possible changes to 4.4 - by Sombs - 12-20-2016, 02:49 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode