(12-22-2016, 03:32 PM)Sombra Hookier Wrote: ...with a red target...
That's the next thing in that FRs intel gathering. I show as hostile to the cloaked ship, which was an Oracle -and- the very same character as the one who did make the post for the CID. Though I do fly OC-Guard IFF, this still means the ship wasn't friendly with the OC, bc a single bribe gets the Guard-IFF to neutral.
Raises the question how a character, who is supposed to be the same character, can suddenly have its original affiliation change so much, when the Oracles and NC aren't supposed to be that much different?
[11.12.2016 17:43:15] Skorak: It's not like she's in one faction pretending to be something else.
[11.12.2016 17:43:55] Skorak: The factions don't even have conflicting origins or interests.
[11.12.2016 17:46:35] Skorak: They are both the same person!
[11.12.2016 17:46:51] Skorak: In two different organisations.
[12.12.2016 00:52:46] Skorak: Like your IFF matters at all.
[12.12.2016 00:54:07] Skorak: I'd not care about a bribe either.
[12.12.2016 00:54:12] Skorak: I get my ID, it fixes the rep.
[12.12.2016 00:54:13] Skorak: Done.
[12.12.2016 00:54:35] Skorak: I don't give a damn about my repsheet.
[12.12.2016 00:54:51] Divine: but if you want to play a char that's also your CID char, as in Foxglove's case, then I'd at least expect it to be allied or friendly at least to the OC
[12.12.2016 00:55:25] Divine: if it's the same character, it -should- be friendly to the OC
[12.12.2016 00:55:25] Skorak: He has multiple ships?
[12.12.2016 00:55:32] Divine: same char, you told me.
[12.12.2016 00:55:39] Skorak: Uhm yeah?
[12.12.2016 00:55:47] Divine: same char, other ship. still this one rep should be always staying.
[12.12.2016 00:55:48] Skorak: It's both Mercante.
[12.12.2016 00:56:13] Skorak: Yeah because anyone would bother keeping the rep between multiple ships synced.
//Edit: So IFFs don't matter, chars can be freely in multiple groups for convenience, your original chars rep is merely a guideline and stalking people on cloaked ships to not have to bother with interaction or being acted upon is solid, valid RP.
Seriously. Hiding behind a cloak to escape a RP-interaction.
//Edit:
(12-22-2016, 03:38 PM)Engel Wrote: As I said it's hard to face, but it's better to keep some diginity after all and not spread obvious nonsense.
There used to be a rule against double-factioning a char bc it's too close to meta.