Technocracy of Auxo - Feedback

[Vendetta]

Hi there, I thought I'd be constructive and post ways in which I think Auxesia could improve as well as some concerns about the faction itself.

Firstly I'd like to point this out :

Remind me again, why does the Commune know to ask people to watch/ask about Inverness/Kansas for Aux?

There has been zero interaction in those systems on either (C~ or A/). How would they even know about it to ask in the first place?

I'm asking you why you know how to question Inverness during those 'interrogations' - and somehow knew BEFOREHAND to ask about the specific systems with NO BACKGROUND RP.

You don't have any forum roleplay. You barely have in-game roleplay or encounters with the opposing faction.

Again, it's funny how you target the specific systems with poor reasoning. I'm capitalising the keypoints here.

Oh well, you've given me your answer.

I make these two quotes because what you accuse the faction I'm in of is metagameing (Though this is not the case), this however is something I believe your faction quiet frequently does, allow me to elaborate.

During our second encounter in Bretonia Sapphire Raven says this

[06.12.823 A.S 19:33:57] BPA)Steve.Judge: Gentllemen ets not forget our combined cause
[06.12.823 A.S 19:34:02] (C~Skywolf.02: Do we have a deal?
[06.12.823 A.S 19:34:07] BPA)Steve.Judge: We have a mutual goal
[06.12.823 A.S 19:34:12] Sapphire.Raven: No you don't.
[06.12.823 A.S 19:34:15] Sapphire.Raven: They kiss the Nomads.

I would like to know how Aux knew this without a single piece of evidence to support it in their logs not to mention having no in-game encounters where a nomad was present. It also seems to be a trend as I've also herd from others who flew Wilde ships with no nomad tech saying how your group declared them infected on the second encounter with no evidence to support it apart from the Wilde ID they have.

Hello. Happy Festivus.

Now let's begin.

The Commune is an organization that we've interacted with as a faction and prior to the faction being formed. I myself and my character had some extensive roleplay with Andre Rise and the others around the time the Commune had formed. Within history and knowing that they're the remnants of the Samarran Raiders through talks and discovery over the past year, and knowing that they 'intend to continue where they left off' as Nomak had put it in one encounter over a year ago now, it's safe to assume that we're not friends.

Now take in to consideration a video of Jared Nomak assisting the Nomads: bloop

Next, take in to consideration Commune ships opening fire on us with known and unknown wild vessels present in Coronado. This is known as guilt by association. When one party operates in close proximity to a known infectee, effectively serving as a teammate or associate - as the term plainly states - it's once again safe to assume they too are either indoctrinated or infected.

Now this is all well and before you had returned to the server.

Additionally there was more metagameing I encountered from your group though it was a good while ago, I refer of course to a sanction I reported shown here. Normally I don't file sanctions but in this case I felt his behavior warranted one. I also found it particularly disappointing when I found that only requests for evidence were posted and not one single post was made to say the member in question was spoken to or had the rules explained to him. There wasn't even so much as an apology from either faction and when I later learned that the said member was still in both factions with no repercussions to his rank it made me think. It made me think that maybe you guys actually want members like this in your faction and that you guys want to ruin people's role play, but that's just my 2 cents.

This sanction was heavily discussed and reviewed by myself and the other members of the high command. We won't punish people by demoting them without a roleplay specific reason behind it or kick them out for anything minor. These situations are handled behind the scenes because drama is irritating.

And no, we're not out to ruin the game for people.

Next I'd like to talk about your ZOI, at the moment Auxesia doesn't seem to have a ZOI and I'd like to know the reasoning behind why such a small faction has such a large ZOI. I mean if you spread a large army over a even larger area then it can be defeated easily simply because other factions have large armies in smaller areas so they can bring more ships to a fight where as your faction would have it's assets too far spread apart. I also don't understand why your faction needs such a large ZOI and even so, don't you think that's a bit overpowered for an ID?

Our ZOI is Sirius wide and our ID is severely limited on what we can actually do. We don't have a fixed base location. Being able to spread in small numbers and move freely between three of the four houses (currently) is our strength, as we can blend in with regular traffic and space ourselves out rather than collectively grouping together and making ourselves a much larger target. Conclaves of people exist in several safehouse locations and other outposts as central hubs of communication and commerce as the faction further develops its culture and a standing ground.

More on that will be discussed soon™.

---

Currently unable to consistently be present in the Community due to life constraints.

Youtube

------