Admin Notice: ZOI changes for RM, BDM, BAF and BIS. (Feedback Time)

[Foxglove]

[...]

Offered Solution:

The RFP leader, who agrees there is a problem, offered this solution here:

RM ID: "Can enforce Bretonian laws and assist Bretonian lawfuls in Omega-3"

BAF ID: "Can enforce Rheinland laws and assist Rheinland lawfuls in Omega-7"

source: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread...pid1851219 Post #11

Going by the same thought, LN ID should not have ZoI in Bretonia, but should also get this line:

BAF ID: "Can enforce Bretonian laws and assist Bretonian lawfuls in [systems]"

I can only repeat myself: Do not make the wish to assist cross border possible via ZoI. This opens a can of worms. The "+1 line" approach clarifies it a lot better and makes the wording a lot clearer against abuse.

I agree with Jack, actually. If anything, the foreign militaries should be held to the laws of the house they are, by way of exception (!), allowed to intrude into. It wouldn't really make that much sense to suddenly punish people for deeds that are perfectly legal in other jurisdictions as well, except if it was a Rheinlander or Rheinland corporation that smuggled the Blood Diamonds in Bretonia, to stay with your example, since as a citizen or legal entity with main seat in Rheinland, you are bound to its laws regardless of where you currently are in addition to the Bretonian laws.

---