I can I please have a logical explanation to why an act that broke no rules and is different to no other instance of buttcloaking is somehow sanctionable?
I was going to log the durango for the nomad event
Because the vote on a sanction is dependent on a majority. More members of the vote thought that the instance shown within the evidence was harmful for the server gameplay than those who did not.
Was there actually anyone who voted in favor of what the rules dictate or is the statement a cover up.
I'd like to think my efforts to justify weren't completely naught.