Are outcast cap ships now open to any ID?

[n00bl3t]

Do the use of capitols undermine and agruement fataly??? Does the case you use affect meaning??? Hmmm somehow I think not. I use capitols to amphase what I am trying to say, you can;t hear the tone in my voice as I type so you lose a lot of the actualy communication that way... However this is massively irrelevant. He has complained and complained for a very long time. however he has achieved nothing, he has refused to respond to anything he can't argue with. Nothing anyone other than him has been accepted by him, nothing... I find that to be extremely annoying. Fundamental things had to be layed down and he still refuted them out of sheer blinding will to argue... how very obnoxious.

"He who establishes his argument by noise and command shows that his reason is weak." - Michel de Montaigne.

And you've answered your own question here; as you say that you use case to emphasise meaning. Meaning can be changed by emphasis on certain words. I trust I do not have to state examples.

Edit:

I have responded to every point made with a point, rather than with ad hominems like your above response.

Instead of this attack on me, why don't you actually address the points I made that no one has addressed?

Why are you claiming this is needed to squelch a problem that can't even be shown to exist in any quantity if at all?

Why are you targeting all indie cap ships instead of just the problem ones?

Since the problem players, if they exist at all, can be moderated without targeting all the indies, what's the real reason behind this digging for excuses to shoot people oorp?
One more thing, I'd like to start a clan for any cap ships under KOS orders in their original system, a rag tag group banding together to survive. Some of those the 101st or the RM (I see more pirates in New Berlin than the RM though) have falsely declared traitors and driven out of their homes.

I'll soon have an outcast destroyer for a start.

State your points out, in dot form so it's easier to see what they are. I'd really like to see them instead of having to read chunks of text.:)

---

Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.