• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Balance
« Previous 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 55 Next »
Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change"

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Would you like to see the proposed "standardization" of armor and nanobots for smaller ships? Please also take the time to post WHY you voted for a certain answer.
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes.
50.00%
30 50.00%
No.
50.00%
30 50.00%
Total 60 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change"
Offline aerelm
04-19-2017, 11:15 PM, (This post was last modified: 04-19-2017, 11:19 PM by aerelm.)
#28
0110000101100101
Posts: 5,265
Threads: 522
Joined: Oct 2009

A little disclaimer on the top of the post: I'm not suggesting anything, it's just a little insight to one "balance variable" which, looking at this thread, might not have been obvious enough. So it's basically "something to consider when voting on this proposal" sort of post.

The original intention behind giving some ships more hull and less nanos or less hull and more nanos was to make certain ships more prone to instakills while others more tanky. Granted, that's not really the case unless the pilot is rather careless and doesn't regen in time, so in other words, it was a veiled attempt to add nano use into "skill-tree", so people who were actually familiar with the armor grading of the particular ship they were flying at the time could keep an eye on when to regen (rather than the standardized "regen at 2/3 hull" we had before that), while less experienced pilots could be disposed of more quickly and turned into nanofarms for those who actually push a (group)fight forward. You might say it was somewhat of an elitist move, but sounded like a good idea at the time.

I personally prefer how the "regen threshold" varies between different grades of ship in each class, while some might find it annoying, confusing, or useless. The point is, without little balance touches like this, "Skill" will basically boil down to aim, while toying with certain stats such as this one, would include a flavor of "situational awareness" into the mix, and would in turn mean more skill-oriented dogfights past the point of "how many shots you can hit in any given time".
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 07:06 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Vendetta - 04-19-2017, 07:21 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Enkidu - 04-19-2017, 07:25 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Vendetta - 04-19-2017, 07:27 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Kauket - 04-19-2017, 07:46 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Enkidu - 04-19-2017, 07:55 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 07:57 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Kauket - 04-19-2017, 08:10 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Kauket - 04-19-2017, 07:23 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Wesker - 04-20-2017, 01:54 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by nOmnomnOm - 04-19-2017, 07:30 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 07:30 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Traxit - 04-19-2017, 07:34 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Unlucky_Soul - 04-19-2017, 07:36 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 07:40 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Epo - 04-19-2017, 07:49 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by TheShooter36 - 04-19-2017, 07:52 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 08:13 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Corile - 04-19-2017, 08:25 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by An'shur - 04-19-2017, 08:28 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Traxit - 04-19-2017, 08:58 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Norael - 04-19-2017, 09:03 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Omi - 04-19-2017, 09:17 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by sasapinjic - 04-19-2017, 09:24 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Backo - 04-19-2017, 09:30 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Antonio - 04-19-2017, 09:47 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by sasapinjic - 04-19-2017, 09:50 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Shiki - 04-19-2017, 10:33 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by aerelm - 04-19-2017, 11:15 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Toris (Old Account) - 04-19-2017, 11:20 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Internity - 04-20-2017, 12:01 AM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-20-2017, 01:46 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Kaze - 04-20-2017, 02:09 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Internity - 04-20-2017, 03:28 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Traxit - 04-20-2017, 03:50 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Corile - 04-20-2017, 03:59 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Traxit - 04-20-2017, 04:15 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by SeaFalcon - 04-20-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by R.I.P. - 04-20-2017, 08:03 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Backo - 04-20-2017, 08:17 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Emperor Tekagi - 04-20-2017, 08:22 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Ace Razgriz - 04-20-2017, 08:31 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by thisDerius - 04-20-2017, 08:36 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by FallenKnight - 04-21-2017, 08:49 AM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by sasapinjic - 04-21-2017, 10:51 AM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Shiki - 04-21-2017, 01:08 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Internity - 04-21-2017, 02:57 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Shiki - 04-21-2017, 03:12 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-21-2017, 01:23 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by FallenKnight - 04-21-2017, 03:02 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode