Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change"

[Traxit]

>>>removing the reward of trapping someone into doing something stupid so you get their regens




stop that

P much this

Even if it is only 10% slapping more armor on and making insta kills less likely isnt appealing. Giving ships with insane handling like the nyx more armor doesnt appeal. That being said, for other VHFs the idea doesnt sound harmful.

I can only see one scenario where giving ships (like the Nyx) more armor that can give a bad result, which is duels, but then again your ship also gains some armor in the end so it's the same thing in the end. Sure it also prolongs duels and gives the faster ship more opportunities to clutch but so do you so it all boils down to the consistency of skill.

This balancing change is aimed for changes outside of conn.

I think I agree with @"Omicega" about what he said about people who voted no. They don't get what this change does when the change is aimed to make the fight more skill-based and not luck-based. And to those complaining about the removal of instakills;
1) Most ships will still get killed to two Nuclear Mines/Mini-Razors, except ships with more than 13,600 hull. And to that, I say @Haste buff MR/Nukes.

2) Instakills are c a n c e r. Instakills may be rewarding for the party that does it but not for the other player and it completely shuts down the player leaving him feeling all kinds of negative stuff. You might think that's what you get for getting careless but instakills mostly come when most unexpected, and I'm sure that's what any victim of an instakill will say.
If I've followed Haste's statements over these years, his intentions were to remove instakills anyways.

---

The best Video Game OST
Just Got Better