• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Balance
« Previous 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 55 Next »
Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change"

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Would you like to see the proposed "standardization" of armor and nanobots for smaller ships? Please also take the time to post WHY you voted for a certain answer.
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes.
50.00%
30 50.00%
No.
50.00%
30 50.00%
Total 60 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change"
Online Emperor Tekagi
04-20-2017, 08:22 PM,
#41
Niemann's legacy
Posts: 2,843
Threads: 267
Joined: Jun 2015

(04-20-2017, 06:33 PM)SeaFalcon Wrote: I honestly don't see why you would spent time on this over other aspects that need changing.

Why not simply adjust some problematic ships that actually need some help instead of redoing the whole system.

I got a feeling the balance devs are looking far too much for major overhauls instead of simply fixing the things that need fixing.
The whole auxiliary weapon update was garbage if I can say so. Oh and it gave all the VHFs a change to nuke + MR someone, so why start trying to fix instant kills now after you mess the whole fighter system up? Also why did the balance devs talk about nerfing nukes and/or the MR and then thought it would be a good idea to put both on a ship-class that was already overused according to most of the community?

I really don't know what goes on in these balance devs heads anymore...

At least there are these heavy fighters like the Loki, totally worth using, just to mention an example I guess or was it 'fixed' already?

Edit: Voted no since you can spent what little time is put into balancing to better use.
No one is waiting to reajust themselves to another pvp overhaul and get used to different stats once more.

Also keep in mind that if you do this, you will have to account for current HP and bot HP in an accumulated fashion.
It really isn't just as easy to say, everyone can refill fully twice and buff armor to not be instant kills.
A whole lot of ships are going to be either buffed or nerfed by adjusting this. Unless you have a proper way to account for ship models that are easy to hit and ships that are more mobile than others...

I will just sign this. Just throwing the idea out is all nice but it should be thought about closely before even considering implementing it. Mind you people will look extremely closely at the dev's work after the recent.. eh things.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 07:06 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Vendetta - 04-19-2017, 07:21 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Enkidu - 04-19-2017, 07:25 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Vendetta - 04-19-2017, 07:27 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Kauket - 04-19-2017, 07:46 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Enkidu - 04-19-2017, 07:55 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 07:57 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Kauket - 04-19-2017, 08:10 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Kauket - 04-19-2017, 07:23 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Wesker - 04-20-2017, 01:54 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by nOmnomnOm - 04-19-2017, 07:30 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 07:30 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Traxit - 04-19-2017, 07:34 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Unlucky_Soul - 04-19-2017, 07:36 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 07:40 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Epo - 04-19-2017, 07:49 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by TheShooter36 - 04-19-2017, 07:52 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 08:13 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Corile - 04-19-2017, 08:25 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by An'shur - 04-19-2017, 08:28 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Traxit - 04-19-2017, 08:58 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Norael - 04-19-2017, 09:03 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Omi - 04-19-2017, 09:17 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by sasapinjic - 04-19-2017, 09:24 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Backo - 04-19-2017, 09:30 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Antonio - 04-19-2017, 09:47 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by sasapinjic - 04-19-2017, 09:50 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Shiki - 04-19-2017, 10:33 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by aerelm - 04-19-2017, 11:15 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Toris (Old Account) - 04-19-2017, 11:20 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Internity - 04-20-2017, 12:01 AM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-20-2017, 01:46 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Kaze - 04-20-2017, 02:09 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Internity - 04-20-2017, 03:28 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Traxit - 04-20-2017, 03:50 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Corile - 04-20-2017, 03:59 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Traxit - 04-20-2017, 04:15 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by SeaFalcon - 04-20-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by R.I.P. - 04-20-2017, 08:03 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Backo - 04-20-2017, 08:17 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Emperor Tekagi - 04-20-2017, 08:22 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Ace Razgriz - 04-20-2017, 08:31 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by thisDerius - 04-20-2017, 08:36 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by FallenKnight - 04-21-2017, 08:49 AM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by sasapinjic - 04-21-2017, 10:51 AM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Shiki - 04-21-2017, 01:08 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Internity - 04-21-2017, 02:57 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Shiki - 04-21-2017, 03:12 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-21-2017, 01:23 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by FallenKnight - 04-21-2017, 03:02 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode