• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Balance
« Previous 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 55 Next »
Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change"

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Would you like to see the proposed "standardization" of armor and nanobots for smaller ships? Please also take the time to post WHY you voted for a certain answer.
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes.
50.00%
30 50.00%
No.
50.00%
30 50.00%
Total 60 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change"
Offline Haste
04-21-2017, 01:23 PM,
#47
Lead Developer
Posts: 3,565
Threads: 107
Joined: May 2012
Staff roles:
Balance Dev

(04-21-2017, 08:49 AM)FallenKnight Wrote: @Haste,
Wouldn't it be a better idea to simply:
1 - reduce the number of nanobots to correspond directly to how many times the ship can repair itself - 2-3 times/2-3 nanobots.
2 - increase the nanobot healing from 600 points [no armor] to 60'000 symbolic number [consider 1]
3 - give 2 nanobots to all LF's and HF's [which means 2 repairs] and 3 to VHFs [3 repairs]

I don't think this is necessarily a bad idea, but I wouldn't describe it as simple because every other ship (class) would have to get a reduced number of regens as well. That, and the NPC-related issues make this a more complex approach to the same "problem". It would also make snubs objectively worse as you would have to repair at an extremely low amount of hull to efficiently use nanobots. This can be seen as either good or bad, depending on your PoV.

In all likelihood, point 3 would be the other way around. HFs and LFs would get more repairs as they currently get more nanobots-per-armor than VHFs already.

Oh, and I did unfortunately use the wrong repair amount in the OP. It's 600 instead of 400. This means that ships would likely get three repairs, and the numbers would be very slightly different. Doesn't change the subject of the poll much, though.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 07:06 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Vendetta - 04-19-2017, 07:21 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Enkidu - 04-19-2017, 07:25 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Vendetta - 04-19-2017, 07:27 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Kauket - 04-19-2017, 07:46 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Enkidu - 04-19-2017, 07:55 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 07:57 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Kauket - 04-19-2017, 08:10 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Kauket - 04-19-2017, 07:23 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Wesker - 04-20-2017, 01:54 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by nOmnomnOm - 04-19-2017, 07:30 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 07:30 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Traxit - 04-19-2017, 07:34 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Unlucky_Soul - 04-19-2017, 07:36 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 07:40 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Epo - 04-19-2017, 07:49 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by TheShooter36 - 04-19-2017, 07:52 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 08:13 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Corile - 04-19-2017, 08:25 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by An'shur - 04-19-2017, 08:28 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Traxit - 04-19-2017, 08:58 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Norael - 04-19-2017, 09:03 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Omi - 04-19-2017, 09:17 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by sasapinjic - 04-19-2017, 09:24 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Backo - 04-19-2017, 09:30 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Antonio - 04-19-2017, 09:47 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by sasapinjic - 04-19-2017, 09:50 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Shiki - 04-19-2017, 10:33 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by aerelm - 04-19-2017, 11:15 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Toris (Old Account) - 04-19-2017, 11:20 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Internity - 04-20-2017, 12:01 AM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-20-2017, 01:46 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Kaze - 04-20-2017, 02:09 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Internity - 04-20-2017, 03:28 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Traxit - 04-20-2017, 03:50 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Corile - 04-20-2017, 03:59 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Traxit - 04-20-2017, 04:15 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by SeaFalcon - 04-20-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by R.I.P. - 04-20-2017, 08:03 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Backo - 04-20-2017, 08:17 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Emperor Tekagi - 04-20-2017, 08:22 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Ace Razgriz - 04-20-2017, 08:31 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by thisDerius - 04-20-2017, 08:36 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by FallenKnight - 04-21-2017, 08:49 AM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by sasapinjic - 04-21-2017, 10:51 AM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Shiki - 04-21-2017, 01:08 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Internity - 04-21-2017, 02:57 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Shiki - 04-21-2017, 03:12 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-21-2017, 01:23 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by FallenKnight - 04-21-2017, 03:02 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode