• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Balance
« Previous 1 … 3 4 5 6 7 … 55 Next »
Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change"

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Poll: Would you like to see the proposed "standardization" of armor and nanobots for smaller ships? Please also take the time to post WHY you voted for a certain answer.
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes.
50.00%
30 50.00%
No.
50.00%
30 50.00%
Total 60 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change"
Offline FallenKnight
04-21-2017, 03:02 PM,
#49
Member
Posts: 1,077
Threads: 69
Joined: May 2010

@Haste, My idea of points 1-3 was meant to be taken as one proposal, not separated points. I am aware it might take some time [a lot of time] for the necessary changes in the files but once they are done - the new system would be better and simple solution compared to the current one. You see someone with 128 b/b and you are unaware how many times can they repair - you have to pay attention from time to time [being distracted]. It would be far more simple way to scan an enemy - see they have 2 repairs and know that once they repair the hull twice [no matter at what point] - they are going down.

NPCs should have no b/b - that would automatically clear the abuse issues.

(04-21-2017, 01:23 PM)Haste Wrote: It would also make snubs objectively worse as you would have to repair at an extremely low amount of hull to efficiently use nanobots. This can be seen as either good or bad, depending on your PoV.
Your point is noted but in this way - every player can decide when to repair. A lot of vets can survive at 10% hp for a lot of time and would benefit greatly from this new system, while new players would pop repair sooner, out of fear not to die. To know the exact moment to repair would depend on your skill and understanding of the battle situation which will only make engagements more fun and definitely...not taking so much time.

I don't want to sound like I am forcing my idea - I just thought about this since a lot of time and found the right time to share it. If you are planning to "change" in any way the b/b system then perhaps it would be more reasonable to overhaul it, instead to fix it. Sometimes to bring something new would be better than fixing something not working right.

[Image: HEdQNeI.png]
[Image: iELcapo.png]
Discovery Bridges[Feedback] Baron Piett[Biography]
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 07:06 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Vendetta - 04-19-2017, 07:21 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Enkidu - 04-19-2017, 07:25 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Vendetta - 04-19-2017, 07:27 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Kauket - 04-19-2017, 07:46 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Enkidu - 04-19-2017, 07:55 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 07:57 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Kauket - 04-19-2017, 08:10 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Kauket - 04-19-2017, 07:23 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Wesker - 04-20-2017, 01:54 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by nOmnomnOm - 04-19-2017, 07:30 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 07:30 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Traxit - 04-19-2017, 07:34 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Unlucky_Soul - 04-19-2017, 07:36 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 07:40 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Epo - 04-19-2017, 07:49 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by TheShooter36 - 04-19-2017, 07:52 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-19-2017, 08:13 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Corile - 04-19-2017, 08:25 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by An'shur - 04-19-2017, 08:28 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Traxit - 04-19-2017, 08:58 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Norael - 04-19-2017, 09:03 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Omi - 04-19-2017, 09:17 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by sasapinjic - 04-19-2017, 09:24 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Backo - 04-19-2017, 09:30 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Antonio - 04-19-2017, 09:47 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by sasapinjic - 04-19-2017, 09:50 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Shiki - 04-19-2017, 10:33 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by aerelm - 04-19-2017, 11:15 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Toris (Old Account) - 04-19-2017, 11:20 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Internity - 04-20-2017, 12:01 AM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-20-2017, 01:46 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Kaze - 04-20-2017, 02:09 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Internity - 04-20-2017, 03:28 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Traxit - 04-20-2017, 03:50 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Corile - 04-20-2017, 03:59 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Traxit - 04-20-2017, 04:15 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by SeaFalcon - 04-20-2017, 06:33 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by R.I.P. - 04-20-2017, 08:03 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Backo - 04-20-2017, 08:17 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Emperor Tekagi - 04-20-2017, 08:22 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Ace Razgriz - 04-20-2017, 08:31 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by thisDerius - 04-20-2017, 08:36 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by FallenKnight - 04-21-2017, 08:49 AM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by sasapinjic - 04-21-2017, 10:51 AM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Shiki - 04-21-2017, 01:08 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Internity - 04-21-2017, 02:57 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Shiki - 04-21-2017, 03:12 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by Haste - 04-21-2017, 01:23 PM
RE: Armor & Nanobot Standardization | "QoL change" - by FallenKnight - 04-21-2017, 03:02 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode