Existing Line: 3.8 Attacking people in Connecticut, without their express permission Suggested Alteration: 3.8 Attacking people in Connecticut without their permission. Description/Comments: Coma is needless; Simplified the statement.
Existing Line: 4.2 Demands should be reasonable and only one monetary or cargo demand can be issued during each piracy interaction. Suggested Alteration: 4.2 Demands should be reasonable and only one monetary or cargo demand can be issued during each piracy interaction. Player can demand all the cargo if it reflects the used ID. Description/Comments: I am not sure how to exactly word it up, but factions such as Xenos have possibility to demand all the cargo and destroy it, because that is their roleplay and shouldn't be considered griefing or trolling. I think we should reflect such a thing within server rules.
Existing Line:(No such a rule.) Suggested Alteration: 4.5? Smuggling does not count as unlawful action within ID rules. However, certain cargo may be restricted within roleplay by House Laws and confiscated by respectable factions as consequence of such. Description/Comments: There are people who still confuse that smuggling cannot be done by Freelancers because it is (factually) an unlawful action. The part in italics is optional, but offers clarification.
