I think WP tries to point out at the different issue in here. Namely, this: I would pretty much understand if The Core would attack a Freelancer for possession of the ships designed by APM for The Core - cause these ships contain parts of the reverse-engineed AI and Nomad tech. However, the issues arises with the ships designed by APM for Bounty Hunters - which are created 'traditionally' for, like, past 100 years? Bounty Hunters are recepient of the vessels and guns, but not their manufacturer.
Whan it case of the situation in which a player claims that Orca was sold to him or his company/faction/mercenary group by APM without inclusion of the Bounty Hunters Guild? Remember my analogy with M4A1 and AR-15? It is like paramilitary group supplied by Colt's Manufacturing Company harassed a guy who just legally bought AR-15 in the shop.
This little bird went to sleep forever. So long.
Thank you for everything.
