• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community The Community Flood
« Previous 1 … 77 78 79 80 81 … 387 Next »
JD rework

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

JD rework
Offline Sombs
10-23-2017, 11:08 PM, (This post was last modified: 10-23-2017, 11:11 PM by Sombs.)
#14
Three orange cats in a mech
Posts: 6,829
Threads: 503
Joined: Feb 2014

I see less harm to be done by cloaked ships that have shields after decloaking than from battleships that can instakill any ship smaller than CAU8 cruisers. The effect of battleships buttcloaking other battleships is the same - by the time the enemy realizes he got buttcloaked, the power of the buttcloaker is merely recharging, allowing the other battleship to deshield the buttcloaker with ease.


(10-23-2017, 10:42 PM)diamond1 Wrote:
(10-23-2017, 07:23 PM)Sombra Hookier Wrote: As I said, that would be punishment for all people instead of the one who actually did the trolling. You already mentioned it was a rule violation by the way you described it. No need to punish all people for it.

No, Mep, don't deletim.

It’ll be a problem in the future when I have to start laughing at people for complaining about how it ruins roleplay.

There is already issues with mostly-cap players according to some people. What’s not to say about this happening too?

What I’m keen to know is why you want it to stay like this? It would have been perfectly fine didn’t have dual equips. I just don’t think it should be a good idea to have what will be now two of the most powerful pieces of equipment..

Because nothing is less annoying than having other people suffer from the damage caused by single individuals that can't play along the rules. That, and there is also not much more annoying than being forced to switch out special equipment depending on what you are going to do. This one issue is only about the JD MK4 and I see no reason why you would force harm on people using JD 2 and JD 3 and people that are able to use JD 4 without rule violations because you had _one_ bad experience that you refuse to learn from but instead play crylancer.




Uncharted System Stories: 18 | 32 | 34 | 37 | 38 | 85

Templates: Character | Transmissions



Reply  


Messages In This Thread
JD rework - by Epo - 10-23-2017, 05:54 PM
RE: JD rework - by ronillon - 10-23-2017, 06:01 PM
RE: JD rework - by Epo - 10-23-2017, 06:08 PM
RE: JD rework - by Sombs - 10-23-2017, 06:27 PM
RE: JD rework - by Nerva Regis - 10-23-2017, 06:32 PM
RE: JD rework - by diamond1 - 10-23-2017, 06:37 PM
RE: JD rework - by Sombs - 10-23-2017, 06:54 PM
RE: JD rework - by Giorgio - 10-23-2017, 11:03 PM
RE: JD rework - by diamond1 - 10-23-2017, 07:02 PM
RE: JD rework - by Sombs - 10-23-2017, 07:09 PM
RE: JD rework - by diamond1 - 10-23-2017, 07:19 PM
RE: JD rework - by Sombs - 10-23-2017, 07:23 PM
RE: JD rework - by diamond1 - 10-23-2017, 10:42 PM
RE: JD rework - by Sombs - 10-23-2017, 11:08 PM
RE: JD rework - by Giorgio - 10-23-2017, 11:19 PM
RE: JD rework - by E X O D I T E - 10-23-2017, 11:23 PM
RE: JD rework - by diamond1 - 10-23-2017, 11:28 PM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode