Quote:"Well, 8 renamings in a year is a signal that you say things and flee from consequences. Not related to any faction, just to the fact that not even you stand for what you say, and im showing this to other ppl"
Wow, what an illogical answer. When did I run from consequences? Even with renaming,people can see my peruvious names by doing 2 clicks. So your statement is still illogical.
This subject is off-topic by the way. Carry it somewhere else or just end it.
Quote:Surely you should not say they are pro, but i will give an example of objective feedback
Have you read my first or second feedback to them at all? I gave them objective feedback about what they should fix for now. (saying for the second or third time). I do not give names because I have dignity; also I believe that the faction's leader is competent enough to kindly ask using a message, something like: "Hey, guys, please be careful and keep good roleplay and interactions!".
And what made you think that DSS leader doesnt spend time talking to his family members about conduct or RP or naming conventions, or ANYTHING else for that matter??
And i think Fellipe is talking about credibility here, which is by far the most important thing when you decide what kind of remarks come from people.
If you have credibility and dignity as you say, then why not structure your own sentances in a more positive but still critical manner.
And werent you taxed for creating a POB withour even a word about doing it??
And you question DSS about their RP????????
Credibility my friend, hard to establish but easely lost
