Player Owned Bases

[Karlotta]

Karlotta, i think, you need rephrase what you want do, because now i think, we all see your posts like "Restrict bases in mining fields, move bases in restricted areas, because people not think before to do and they suffer from it"

I do sometimes get the impression that I'm speaking Chinese to some people, but after re-reading my posts and reading the posts of people who don't seem to understand anything I say, it becomes clear that problem does not come from a language barrier on my side. Some people just miss things that were clearly stated before, and it seems to always be the same people, while others are able to understand me just fine.

Im start understand what you want only after clarification in your answers to Thyrzul and ronillon. Hmm... now i can say why your proposal still bad.
1)Towns grow on trade routes. Not trade routes grow on towns. Creating restrictions for mining PoBs, you are not only save people who just not thinked before built, but you are ruin gameplay of peoples who love make supply chains. We are need server rights build PoBs everywhere where we need in current moment. All another things should do current diplomacy. I mean, i work with some PoBs in mining fields which created not for avoid pirates or solo mining, but for create working economy.

You can do everything on a base 15k away from a mining field that you can do on a base right inside a mining field, except dock as soon as you see a pirate and mine in the smallest most efficient miners alone (which were balanced for teamwork, not solo-mining). Both of the things that you need a base inside the field to do are detrimental to game play. No matter if it's built by "people who just not thinked before built", or "peoples who love make supply chains". You can make a supply chain 15k from the field, in a "town" closer to an already existing trade route/lane.

2) I think, it obviously, but your proposal about industrial zones....eemmm not have sense? Because it only will turn Liberty in complete JD manufacturing centre, just because all commodities close to this. It change nothing else, because a) Houses restrict nomad materials. b) Omegas/Omicrons factions restrict foreign activity/dont had RP-wise justification for guarded areas, Tau under gallic feet. So, for what is it?

It's for encouraging players to build bases near existing NPC bases and lanes, in locations that won't draw their activity to some remote place where no one but the base owners go. This doesnt even need a rule, only a house law that focuses industrial bases to certain locations instead of granting them in lonely places instead. The rule would just support the houses in that policy, and make sure that they stay fair in it. Supporting "open docking and sale" policy would also help engage players in supply of those bases, and facilitate supply chains and speed up production.

As far as I know only cloaks need nomad remains, not jump drives. The permitted factories and goods would be defined by the faction/government that manage the specific zone. Cloaks, for example, wouldnt be produced in Bretonia or Liberty, they would be produced in Omicron Mu, in a centralized, well protected, and busy place like Planet Akabat, selling and buying only from Order ships. The Core or Zoners can create and manage their own zones where allow what they want.

Oh.. sorry, my engrish not allow me write minds about it in good form. Only "trailers park" looks good from your proposals, because its can be sandbox for people who "suffer and make drama". I really think all other people is normal now, without rules changes.
Please, look firstly how PoBs work around freel economy, how work RP around it, factions laws about not only PoBs but needed resourses, and you will rework it good

I know PoB economy quite well, thank you. I've had several bases on various servers for a long time, including in mining fields, including factories, including in remote places, including in active places, and including open economy bases.

Trailer parks were one example of the most simple kind of zone, where people can build much more freely than now (no need to ask house permission first), as long as they stick to simple rules like "no core above 1, no weapons platforms, no contraband, no hostile rep".

I believe your English may not only be a problem for making yourself understood, but also for understanding what I said. That and that you also don't seem to think about the implications and the larger context of what I say, only about small parts of the post that caught your attention or that you understood while not understanding other parts.

---

User was banned for: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...tid=200950
Time left: (Permanent)