• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 39 40 41 42 43 … 780 Next »
Carrier Class Ships

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Carrier Class Ships
Offline OrignlGaminGeneration (OGG)
03-28-2018, 12:21 AM,
#11
Member
Posts: 94
Threads: 13
Joined: Nov 2017

(03-27-2018, 10:55 PM)Thunderer Wrote:
(03-27-2018, 09:49 PM)OrignlGaminGeneration Wrote: I even offered to do the close combat while they fired their Hurricanes and Nightmare torps from a 3 k distance and always the same answer " No. That is a Valor".

Stress on the "A". A Valor. One Valor. This means that they didn't want to join you because they didn't want to treat the player behind the Valor unfairly. 2 vs 1 is unfair. They were not afraid, they just thought you could kill him alone. If you can't, you should have offered them to kill it instead, while you would stay in reserve in case something unpredictable happens, like another Valor arriving, or your mate losing connection. The battle they will not lose.


(03-27-2018, 09:49 PM)OrignlGaminGeneration Wrote: In the mean time how about offering training to the Indie Dunkirk so they would get the "soldier" mentality instead of "warrior" thinking. Soldiers win wars, Warriors die and have statues erected to inspire the masses.

I already do that, and what you pointed out in the about soldier vs warrior is part of my training, but I explain it differently. To me, it is Romans vs barbarians. This means that, even if you have great personal skill, you will contribute to the general effort minimally if you do not coordinate with others. On the other hand, even if your skill in duels is average, you can contribute a great deal in a fleet battle if you coordinate well with others. A single barbarian will beat a single Roman. However, a Roman army will beat a barbarian army. Coordination and discipline.

Still, this is not needed if your opponent is just 1 Valor. We, in the BAF|, treat our opponents fairly so that they would come again, otherwise we would have nothing to shoot at. So, we don't gank them with 2 ships on 1, or a gunboat against a fighter, or similar. At least if we're just having a normal pew, but if we're defending a convoy with cargo, or a POB, then we'll use all that is necessary.
The "A Valor" was followed by up with green PM of how they did not think 2v1 could win against Valor. I disagree with the "unfair" aspect of your thinking. however I do see your point of people not returning if you "gank" them. I grew up in a military family and there is no such thing as fair play in War. 1v1 fair play IS warrior thinking. Soldier thinking is using all assets to bring to bare to accomplish victory. If I am out there alone and a Valor, Fighter and Battle Cruiser was before me than I expect to be attacked by them all and I will attack them. It will lead to a really quick demise of my ship which I am ok with. It is why I don't watch 1v1 fighter battles inRP after watching 2 battles when I first purchased Carrier. The only time I stick around is if I see same enemy tag in near by systems. then I just shoot the annoying NPCs that engage PvP players. I do respect the wishes of the players when they refuse the "assisting friendly" that I offer. And Group coordination is critical. If the the Dunkirk and the training is a match for Gallic forces then why did the BAF groups and Indie IDs lose so badly at the "Battle for Leeds"? I saw the videos on You Tube someone posted of this engagement and it was one sided.
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Carrier Class Ships - by OrignlGaminGeneration (OGG) - 03-27-2018, 05:12 AM
RE: Carrier Class Ships - by Darkseid667 - 03-27-2018, 09:18 AM
RE: Carrier Class Ships - by Enkidu - 03-27-2018, 10:14 AM
RE: Carrier Class Ships - by sasapinjic - 03-27-2018, 10:18 AM
RE: Carrier Class Ships - by OrignlGaminGeneration (OGG) - 03-27-2018, 12:21 PM
RE: Carrier Class Ships - by sasapinjic - 03-27-2018, 12:58 PM
RE: Carrier Class Ships - by Thunderer - 03-27-2018, 03:50 PM
RE: Carrier Class Ships - by OrignlGaminGeneration (OGG) - 03-27-2018, 09:49 PM
RE: Carrier Class Ships - by TheShooter36 - 03-27-2018, 10:00 PM
RE: Carrier Class Ships - by Thunderer - 03-27-2018, 10:55 PM
RE: Carrier Class Ships - by OrignlGaminGeneration (OGG) - 03-28-2018, 12:21 AM
RE: Carrier Class Ships - by Titan* - 03-28-2018, 01:37 AM
RE: Carrier Class Ships - by OrignlGaminGeneration (OGG) - 03-28-2018, 04:30 AM
RE: Carrier Class Ships - by Thunderer - 03-28-2018, 11:39 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2026 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode