And here comes the next volley of ad hominems, strawmen, appeals to authority, false equivalences, misrepresentations, and accusations fabricated out of thin air, concluded with the claim that I'm the one who is being antagonizing. There has been, if you haven't noticed, quite a lot of antagonizing going on in discovery, also unrelated to me, and related to the people you say I'm antagonizing.
And everything but an acceptance of everything you say is construed as me being "beyond reach" of your kind attempt at helping me realize that something you already said was a good idea, that you or anyone else can't point out what is bad about it, is in fact a bad idea.
If people get pissed off because someone else was able to do what they weren't, that's on them. I understand that it's a more or less common reaction (especially in children and youngsters), but it's something that people should learn to control so they don't block progress. There's a clear cut difference in an ego sparking something positive, and an ego blocking something positive.
Interesting that you bring up Laz and accuse me of projecting myself onto him, while he's the one who posts angel wings everywhere he goes and you call me out for having a messiah complex and pretending I'm a godsend.
It's almost as if your agenda isn't really "constructive criticism" at all, but rather to start a poop-slinging contest that can later be quote-mined as evidence of me being terribly antagonistic, when someone wants to kill something they have no arguments but logical fallacies against. The later are what separates "constructive criticism" from poop-torpedos intended to sink something that you can't sink by any other means.
I've asked for constructive criticism, and implemented it, countless times, including yours. Your last two posts were no such thing.
