[Infopage] Battlegroup Harmony - Information and Feedback

[Antonio]

I've played on both sides by now and can tell it's very easy to not bring the fight to FP2. I think one of the most annoying mentalities is blue-hunters complaining about safe-zones in the game. When people stick to such safe zones, what do? Is getting that blue so important to want to try and change the game?

No.

I think people often forget that they literally cause people to stick to those safe zones. I rather have people stick to safe zones instead of not even logging at all - because everyone seems to value the numbers of people active on the server so much they don't care for what those people are actually doing.

Please try to not fix things that don't need to be fixed. Discovery is big enough, and it's a shame that the same people who demand the removal of systems also demand the removal of safe zones. The only thing more frustrating than seeing people hugging bases or combat-docking is getting seal-clubbed or ganked. Try to think of the other sides' perspective.

I'm sure Freeport 11 with 3 Zoner battleships fully armed with battleship weaponry was a wonderful "safe zone" for your Vagrant. I agree there should be safe zones, but they shouldn't be in activity hubs. Activity hubs are there for everyone, not just friendlies to the strongest solar nearby. It encourages circlejerking 24/7. You can't say it with a serious face that a small Freeport in Bering is supposed to be the most heavily defended place in the game.

Also I am perfectly fine with not removing any system from the game as long as the jumphole connection overhaul is executed correctly so the "discovery" and useless transit systems are fully out of the way. Another topic for another time.

---

SNAC Montage Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5 | Thruster SNAC