Overhaul Sieging Rules.

[Laura C.]

This has been a hot topic in the OFL Chat. The siege mechanics right now are not equal. It's too easy for even a single player to destroy hours of effort as well as money. We had a good idea, albeit a temporary solution:

• Sieging a POB requires a 'Module Tax'
  
• This tax is the sum of all modules in that POB, including the cost of its Core upgrade.
  
• Cost per Core upgrade stacks. So hypothetically a Core 2 POB without any modules costs 116,000,000 to siege. A Core 3 POB without any modules requires 232,000,000 credits to siege. Etc.
  
• As the Core of the POB increases, the tax required scales as well because of the modules and stacking Core upgrade.
  
• As the time invested into upgrading and maintaining a POB cannot realistically be equalised along with sieges, it's better to focus on making POB sieges a moneysink.
  

Uh, what? Is anybody who is behind this idea playing house lawful? So basically someone make an illegal base or start violating laws and lawfuls will be paying tens if not hundreds millions credits to be allowed to act? Are you guys crazy? Considering no RP or fee is required to build an illegal POB, this is perfect way to troll lawfuls just by throwing series of illegal bases on their turf and watching them pay incredible sums to be able to remove them.

Also no, single player can not destroy even core one base, unless the owner is too lazy to build proper shielding and keep proper supplies at the base. And then it is his fault to let his base unprotected.

---

On a ragebreak. Or ragequit. Time will tell.