Overhaul Sieging Rules.

[Laura C.]

All 4 of the bases had /no/ shield or (some had some, some not) repair commodities - apparently. Bases are harder to kill than you think.

Not having a shield or repairs is a death sentence, really, that's error on the user.

*shrugs*
Here we go. Like I said in the other thread, if the time and effort invested into making four cool looking bases would be invested into making one core 3 or 4 base with proper supplies and shield, it would still be there.

I can understand the griefing argument, but a Core 1 should be just as protected as others. Ergo, a flat 100 million credits would be suitable for a Core 1. If it's a act of trolling, report it to the admins.

There is nothing admins can punish, just like they have nothing to punish in these fishy base destructions. You can not punish player for repeatedly building a POB, it is not against rules in any way. Basically once again, because of one fishy siege out of many properly done sieges where bases even had literally no protection due to owners bad judgement, some again want to make all sieges even more difficult for everyone while the base builders can happily continue with building without any requirements, just with need to invest hour of time to gather necessary commodities for base deployment.


But just for the record - I do not say that current system does not need some improvement. But it must be done reasonably and not just in a way of "let´s make all sieges even more difficult because all attackers deserve to be punished for touching the bases regardless of circumstances". Usually all the changes are made only from base owners point of view while no other points of view and scenarios (like lawfuls which has to remove illegal bases from place where they can´t be) are considered.

---

On a ragebreak. Or ragequit. Time will tell.