Overhaul Sieging Rules.

[Wesker]

Uh, what? Is anybody who is behind this idea playing house lawful? So basically someone make an illegal base or start violating laws and lawfuls will be paying tens if not hundreds millions credits to be allowed to act? Are you guys crazy? Considering no RP or fee is required to build an illegal POB, this is perfect way to troll lawfuls just by throwing series of illegal bases on their turf and watching them pay incredible sums to be able to remove them.

Alright then, perhaps simply add an exception that the tax doesn't apply for POB that are in a space covered by laws, so that if they do break those laws, Lawfuls can act logically. The anarchic system we have now is not good. Ultimately, something needs to be done to stop POBs being killed with bare-bones RP for the sake of killing them.

And why the hell should I pay 100 million credits to siege a hiddin core 3 daumann base in omega-54?

Bases enable bad gameplay, bases are sources of salt and drama. Enabling them further to thrive in larger numbers is absurd. I’d rather not have this go through only to be met with a bunch of clowns builiding hostile pobs in unlawful core systems or in edgeworld/BW systems just so they can be sieged at the expense of the attackers money.

Bases aren’t random toys that should be granted immunity, this is literally no different than people complaining in favor of reasons to deny blue messages and engagements because they aren’t garunteed they’d be able to win tenfold.

Bases aren’t entitled toys that should come with minimal strings attached. If you’re going to make one for generating random special snowflake material or bottleneck trade for your own benefit, there needs to be some balance.

---