Overhaul Sieging Rules.

[Nodoka Hanamura]

read the post clearly.

I did. My issue is, you seem to not mind the fact that this person did it purely out of spite. When you and Auxesia would complain about Aoi Isejin ganking you in Inverness (And I'm not counting myself from this, I complained about it in length as well.) Keep in mind that Aoi does have /some/ reason to do what they do. Being a PVP centered faction that goes after anything they see fit. But you (And I did as well) take as a personal slight against Auxesia. This WAS a heavy handed slight against the player. And the fallout has been heavily effecting me. (One of the factions I'm in is getting flak for this.)

There needs to be /something/ to regulate these base sieges. A single post in Stories and Biographies, or a message dump in faction threads should not be enough to carry out a siege. (Nomads excluded because... How would you even? Nomads aren't going to ring up a base and go "Hey uhh... Yeah we're breaking that thing.)

I second this notion. I understand that Susu should have had shields on her base (Something of which, before the whole damn base was torn down - Kruger, O-| and ABH were working on helping her get going) - But this is deflecting fault inherently onto her. The attacker's intentions were blatantly belligerent out of RP, which is a problem. Toxicity is a problem in disco, and sadly always will be, but actually trying to dissuade people from matching it with inRP belligerence would do more good than harm, and actually deter people from taking such actions.

---