Overhaul Sieging Rules.

[Lythrilux]

About unsatisfactory or nonsensical inRP reasons... who is here to judge? Like yeah, let's make sieges admin voted player requests. This is going to work well.

If players want to upgrade their POB, they have to make a request. Past Core 3, they have to show the POB has done adequate roleplay and contributed to the server before they get the blueprint - this request can also be denied. Why should sieges be any different to that? Why do sieges get to bypass being processed or reviewed for adequate RP, when the POB owners who have infinitely more to lose have to be held to a much higher standard? As you said, any action should be mirrored.

Sieges do need to be made harder because right now attackers have nothing to lose. It's insanely unfair. Even in regards to Core 4 (which really are not immortal) and 5 bases, the owners of those bases can lose everything whilst the attackers lose only several hours of their time. It's imbalanced beyond belief. This is not right.

And one more thing. Even Core one can hold siege for days if you actually bother to defend it. This is how you make sieges not easy for your enemy, just defend it instead of whining.

And they blew it up anyway when no one was around to properly defend it. That's not solid game mechanics.

---