Overhaul Sieging Rules.

[Laura C.]

If players want to upgrade their POB, they have to make a request. Past Core 3, they have to show the POB has done adequate roleplay and contributed to the server before they get the blueprint - this request can also be denied. Why should sieges be any different to that? Why do sieges get to bypass being processed or reviewed for adequate RP, when the POB owners who have infinitely more to lose have to be held to a much higher standard? As you said, any action should be mirrored.

Sieges do need to be made harder because right now attackers have nothing to lose. It's insanely unfair. Even in regards to Core 4 (which really are not immortal) and 5 bases, the owners of those bases can lose everything whilst the attackers lose only several hours of their time. It's imbalanced beyond belief. This is not right.

So RP of base owners is evaluated when they want to go past core 3, but RP of attackers should be evaluated even for core 1? How is that fair and not a double standard?

By the way there will be never an equality when it comes to high core bases which exist for months or even years. It´s basically not possible by any mechanism. Unless you want to "make it fair" by forcing attackers to spend same amount of time what the constructions and mantaining took, what would make those bases basically indestructible because no one will bother to siege base for weeks or even months. And if you make the destruction possible within some reasonable timeframe, then there still will be complaints it´s unfair (not to mention that any attrition warfare will end with attackers shooting the base in low activity hours with parked afk caps with locked right mouse button what will again end with owners complaining they can´t be defending their base 24/7 so it´s....unfair).

---

On a ragebreak. Or ragequit. Time will tell.