Overhaul Sieging Rules.

[Binski]

a ship destroyed while participating in a base siege must remain PVP dead to THAT BASE for 5 days

NEMPS exist. In exchange for 200 Sci Data, up to 5 enemy caps are unable to kill your base for the better part of the week.

To me that's the beauty of it. But using NEMP's is harder than it seems at first glance, and combined with the launchers and need for 2 ammo per shot, that ability seems pretty fair to me. Is it really fair to do all that and only knock those 5 attacking ships out of commission for 2 hours? Let them plan around the possibilities of NEMP defense. Maybe you learn hard not to send all your ships in on the first wave from now on. The point of that change is to make you really have to want to put effort into planning a base siege. That should help narrow them to more serious parties and require more organization to oust one. If the attackers aren't that big a force like a navy, they can also use NEMP's or it may discourage lulwats that just want to break stuff without real RP reasons just because they got a new shiny carrier/bs. They try, they die, 5 day diffusion before they try again. Of course to be fair it would be the same for defenders. If you die during a base siege period you should remain eliminated (cruisers and up at least) for that time. Attackers also shouldn't have to face the same defending carrier every 2 hours. 5 days though is my suggestion. 8 hrs, 12hrs, 24hrs, 3 days...any would be a great help, and the longer the better.

---

The Further Exploits of Captain Antares (August 2015) │ (alt) JonasHudson
*Argo | Special Operative ID (Approved Request)* | Argo Compilation Video
################ *Proposed OF Challenge System* ################
############### The Book of Piracy (Piracy Tutorial) ###############
############### Binski Alamo (Youtube Channel) ###############