(07-12-2018, 06:09 AM)Spectre Wrote: The ID, like both Navy official factions, is in essence a copy of the standard indie ID, except with one redundant line allowing them to engage any separatist LSF ships in Alaska. This line isn't useful anymore, since that time has long since passed, and as such they're all effectively the same. Our proposed ID is a reworded, fixed up version of the standard LN ID. As the standard ID does not actually allow us to ally with unlawfuls (as is the same with other lawful IDs), the line 'cannot ally with unlawfuls except the Council' was added to fix this issue.
In addition, each official faction has their own ID for identification purposes, and allowances of faction rights to be enacted on other ships or the ship in question. The description at the top of it leaves it unique, specific to the Third, and gives us individualism from the rest of the Navy secondary.
Hope this clears it up.
Are you seriously?
Just look, group with the Council... Well... On the territory of Bretonia, it seems to me, it is quite possible, is not it? And remove what is not relevant, and then say "this is our ID" - well, this is nonsense. Why just do not ask the administration to remove that in the ID, what is not needed?
And you are going to do ID, as for membership in the faction - so people know that you not only have a tag, but your ID too. Brilliantly! Ie in the tag I do not guess that the ship belongs to the third fleet? If I am a member of the Liberty Police or Navy, I will know. For the pirates, each fleet is one person.
![[Image: c1MhYs-KBQo.jpg]](https://pp.userapi.com/c834204/v834204640/c8bbf/c1MhYs-KBQo.jpg)
![[+]](/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
Collection of my great phrases and citations