I'm going to take this opportunity to point out the following:
LFs (8,500 u) currently have a larger power core capacity than HFs (8,000 u).
HFs still regen more quickly (1,200 u/s) than LFs (1,000 u/s).
Are LFs supposed to have a higher power core but lower core regen than HFs? That seems a little wonky to me.
Some VHFs such as the Starblazer (10,400 u) regenerate slower (1,100 u/s) than a HF (1,200). This seems fine, since the VHF has a blaringly larger capacity than the HF (A 2,400 u difference!). The choice between say, a Starblazer and Falcon, is: Do you want more power regen, or a larger capacity? If you throw a Griffin into this mix, you suddenly have a ship with a lower core regen than both vessels, but a slightly larger core capacity than the Falcon.
Taking things a step further: Why the heck do LF guns chew up so much energy? Is it to compensate for the fact that they only have access to four guns, and those four guns are punchier than their (V)HF counterparts?
If we look at this analytically: A LF firing simultaneously 3 Flashpoints and 1 750m/s Deb will eat up 3,201 u/s.
A (V)HF firing simultaneously 4 Flashpoints and 2 750m/s Debs will eat up 3,269 u/s.
A LF will deal 8,646 DPS with this load out.
A (V)HF will deal 9,229 DPS with this load out.
Granted, yes, LFs shouldn't be able to deal as much Damage Per Second as a (V)HF, since part of playing a LF (currently) is to be a more dodgy support craft. So then, knowing this, why does a standard LF chew through only 68 less u/s than a (V)HF? And this doesn't account for anything other than Flashpoints - LF guns as a whole right now consume ludicrous amounts of energy.
Maybe I'm missing something, such as how LFs are (currently) supposed to have less armor and shielding than (V)HFs in exchange for being smaller and faster. I dunno, LFs just feel so darn crumby right now besides niche ones like the Scimitar.
The Gaelic Wyvern Inn
If you've interacted with us recently, please consider checking out our in-character Public Guest Reviews thread!
