• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Rules & Requests Rules
« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 198 Next »
Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5
Offline Binski
09-15-2018, 05:41 PM,
#48
Member
Posts: 1,531
Threads: 96
Joined: Jun 2013

If the biggest risk of abuse is a multiboxer who logs a mining fighter only to fill a larger vessel, or for a 2nd person to jump on that miner only for those times to help out the main player, then perhaps what we also need are larger transports with faster mining rates. Yes, I know why its been the way it has all this time, I know that it was made and left this way to encourage group interactivity. So, when it does and those people using the same IP want to mine for each other, is that really a problem? If it would be ok to have a second guy jump on to fill his friend, does it really matter if someone multiboxes to fill themselves? Probably not at this point.

Just a point on irony though, you only ever see that problem with ore/gas mining. Junkers have the Salvager, and you know, you never see a smaller miner filling them up, never see them log a little miner for a fill that then disappears. Pretty much says, all mining factions need the equivalent of a Salvager, and we can pretty much ditch the need for party mining at this point. The hurtle, like the sally, comes in the price of the transport vs cargo size. The Salvager didn't kill scrap mining, or mining for non mining capable traders. Junkers still find themselves mining for non Junker customers all the time, and they take care of themselves at the same time.

Back in the day when there would be large Junker convoys to Alpha, everyone would help fill each other, and for non junker traders, someone would whip out a mining ship to speed things up. Their use would still not be completely side lined.

[Image: G38aJ6J.jpg]
The Further Exploits of Captain Antares (August 2015) │ (alt) JonasHudson
*Argo | Special Operative ID (Approved Request)* | Argo Compilation Video
################ *Proposed OF Challenge System* ################
############### The Book of Piracy (Piracy Tutorial) ###############
############### Binski Alamo (Youtube Channel) ###############
Reply  


Messages In This Thread
Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Kazinsal - 09-13-2018, 09:46 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by TacticalNoodle - 09-13-2018, 09:51 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Laura C. - 09-13-2018, 10:06 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Karlotta - 09-13-2018, 10:15 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Antonio - 09-13-2018, 10:32 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Karlotta - 09-13-2018, 10:33 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Backo - 09-13-2018, 10:34 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Settra - 09-13-2018, 10:43 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Aaron_Cianci - 09-13-2018, 11:07 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by sasapinjic - 09-13-2018, 11:14 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Sand-Viper - 09-13-2018, 11:19 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by TacticalNoodle - 09-13-2018, 11:22 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Username removed - 12-13-2018, 06:54 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Laz - 09-13-2018, 11:24 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by JonasHudson - 09-13-2018, 11:42 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by MotokoSusu - 09-13-2018, 11:44 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Karlotta - 09-13-2018, 11:48 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Banned player t202085 - 09-13-2018, 11:59 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Felipe - 09-14-2018, 12:04 AM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by marco - 09-14-2018, 12:12 AM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Thunderer - 09-14-2018, 12:13 AM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Kaze - 09-14-2018, 03:56 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Felipe - 09-14-2018, 12:18 AM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Marburg - 09-14-2018, 12:24 AM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Freeroamer - 09-14-2018, 06:09 AM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by SnakThree - 09-14-2018, 06:53 AM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by PRJKTLRD - 09-14-2018, 07:19 AM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Neraxon - 09-14-2018, 09:22 AM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Durandal - 09-14-2018, 09:45 AM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Epo - 09-14-2018, 10:24 AM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by evanz - 09-14-2018, 10:58 AM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by NoMe - 09-14-2018, 12:12 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Karst - 09-14-2018, 12:48 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Thyrzul - 09-14-2018, 12:55 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by MotokoSusu - 09-14-2018, 03:41 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by St.Denis - 09-14-2018, 04:02 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Altejago - 09-14-2018, 04:12 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Commander Crucible - 09-14-2018, 04:24 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by MotokoSusu - 09-14-2018, 05:19 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Durandal - 09-15-2018, 03:24 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by St.Denis - 09-15-2018, 04:45 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Durandal - 09-15-2018, 04:48 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Thyrzul - 09-15-2018, 05:07 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Durandal - 09-15-2018, 05:26 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by sasapinjic - 09-15-2018, 07:14 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Greylock - 09-15-2018, 04:48 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by St.Denis - 09-15-2018, 04:58 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Greylock - 09-15-2018, 05:20 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Hunor - 09-15-2018, 05:38 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Binski - 09-15-2018, 05:41 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Karlotta - 09-15-2018, 05:50 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Lythrilux - 09-15-2018, 05:44 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by oZoneRanger - 09-16-2018, 10:07 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Kazinsal - 09-16-2018, 11:53 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Skyelius - 09-17-2018, 02:48 AM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Windstar - 09-17-2018, 02:49 AM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by sasapinjic - 09-17-2018, 07:45 AM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by lw'nafh - 10-04-2018, 09:19 AM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by diamond1 - 10-04-2018, 10:24 AM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by ronillon - 12-13-2018, 01:09 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by andytv22 - 12-13-2018, 03:25 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Altejago - 12-13-2018, 03:48 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Vendetta - 12-13-2018, 03:55 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by SnakeLancerHaven - 12-13-2018, 04:10 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by diamond1 - 12-13-2018, 04:15 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Geneva Shipping Platform - 12-13-2018, 04:29 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by SnakThree - 12-13-2018, 04:34 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by suppy - 12-13-2018, 04:43 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Voranathos Cide - 12-13-2018, 04:57 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Sand-Viper - 12-13-2018, 05:18 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Alessa Samson - 12-13-2018, 05:33 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by TheShooter36 - 12-13-2018, 06:05 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by NoMe - 12-13-2018, 06:23 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Greylock - 12-13-2018, 07:11 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Harkewt - 12-13-2018, 08:17 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Lex~Talionis - 12-13-2018, 08:32 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Lythrilux - 12-13-2018, 08:36 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Sand-Viper - 12-13-2018, 08:46 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Freeroamer - 12-13-2018, 10:44 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by ASimpleMan - 12-13-2018, 11:05 PM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by Grumblesaur - 12-14-2018, 05:41 AM
RE: Proposal: Remove second part of Rule 5.5 - by teschy - 05-22-2019, 09:32 AM

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode