Liberty Assault Battlecruisers, and Bounty Hunters

[Jinx]

in that case i still find it surprising that even with proper roleplay - most people refuse the chance to let that happen. - a point blank "no" is what the majority appears to say. ( i find that a little sad, to be honest )

for me that is always about RP of course. - personally, i had no problem with scornstar flying a zoner juggernaut ( when the harvesters started ) as a flagship, although it would easily have been considered doubiously for an enemy to fly the most precious ship the opposing faction has to offer. - however, in RP, it made sense.

anyway - we can agree that its not gonne happen "cause the liberty BC is better" or whatever pvp reason someone might have. - but a proper roleplay background should do the trick. - arguing that "the BHG has good ships" is not arguing in roleplay, but arguing in pvp. - in Role, its not about the stats, - and i know that the BHG BC is better than the liberty one. - but its about a necessity demanded by the role to fly a certain ship.

saying they must not do it, cause they basicly have their own puts those that fly a foreign ship into the "rogue" classification, too. ( remember how the darkwings were attacked for flying liberty capital ships? - they purchased them before the BHG got their cap-ships .... and they were hard pushed to loose them .... will we enforce that for all the characters flying ships that do not belong to their factions, cause they may have their own now? - that *may* well mess with some ppls roleplay. - will we make exceptions? - if so, why do we do it for some and not for others, - cause some are established and proved their RP and others haven t ? - do we give them the chance to prove their RP?

anyway - if we have the option "yes, if proper roleplay is applied" i vote for that one of course, - but not even a starflier should be used without proper roleplay, - or should it?

---

Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC